PubMed · 7045988
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
L de P Castro, J A Salgado. 1981. [Cimetidine].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7045988/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Critically ill patients routinely receive H(2) antagonists for stress ulcer prophylaxis while at risk for gastrointestinal bleeding. In these patients it is often difficult to assess accurately the cause of adverse effects such as thrombocytopenia. We evaluate the literature to better define thrombocytopenia related to H(2) antagonist administration and discuss mechanism, potential as a risk factor and case reports describing the severity and duration of thrombocytopenia.
BACKGROUND: A large proportion of patients in primary care are still being maintained on long-term acid suppression, without any attempts to identify Helicobacter pylori status and to treat those that test positive. OBJECTIVES: To assess the prevalence and economic and symptomatic benefits of H. pylori eradication in patients maintained on long-term H2 receptor antagonists (H2RA) in primary care. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients on long-term (i.e. 6 months or longer) H2RA were identified from the computerised records of six practices in north England. Helicobacter pylori status was identified using serology and H. pylori positive patients were then offered standard 7-day proton pump based triple therapy, followed by a urea breath test (UBT) to confirm H. pylori eradication. Those who had a positive UBT were offered a second line course of H. pylori eradication therapy. Follow up period was 1 year. The main outcome measures were improvement in dyspepsia symptom scores, amount of H2RA being consumed, and economic benefits after H. pylori eradication. RESULTS: One thousand and seven patients (1.5%) were identified on long-term H2RA, of whom 471 (46%) ultimately had their H. pylori serology assessed. Sixty-three (297) percent of the patients tested had a positive serology for H. pylori, the majority of whom (58%, 172) had prior evidence of peptic ulcer disease. The mean duration of therapy and mean time since endoscopy/barium studies was significantly longer in patients with peptic ulcer disease compared to their counterparts with nonulcer dyspepsia and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, p =.0002 and.0001, respectively. After successful H. pylori eradication (which was possible in 84% of the patients), at the end of the 1-year study period, on an intention to treat basis 62% of the patients could either stop or significantly reduce dosage of their H2RA. There was also significant reduction in the mean dose of H2RA being consumed and severity of symptoms at the end of the study period (p <.00001). CONCLUSION: Almost two-thirds of patients on long-term H2RA in primary care will have a positive serology for H. pylori; the majority of these will have peptic ulcer disease. In over 60% of cases H. pylori eradication led to significant improvement in symptom scores and reduction in dosage of H2RA being consumed. Cessation or reduction in long-term H2RA prescribing is cost effective.
AIM: To perform a meta-analysis evaluating the efficacy of H2-receptor antagonists in functional (nonulcer) dyspepsia. SELECTION OF STUDIES: A Medline search was used to identify placebo controlled randomized clinical trials, using the subject headings dyspepsia and H2-receptor antagonist. OUTCOME MEASURES: Global assessment by the patient of dyspepsia symptoms, improvement of epigastric pain and complete relief of epigastric pain. RESULTS: Twenty-two studies met the inclusion criteria, 15 of which reported the active drug to be superior to placebo. Many studies suffered from suboptimal study design. The odds ratio in favour of active drug was 1.48 (95% confidence interval: 0.9-2.3) for global assessment of dyspepsia symptoms, 2.3 (95% CI: 1.6-3.3) for improvement of epigastric pain, and 1.8 (95% CI: 1.2-2.8) for complete relief of epigastric pain. CONCLUSION: There is some evidence that H2-receptor antagonists are superior to placebo in functional dyspepsia, but larger studies evaluating higher doses of H2-receptor antagonists and of longer duration are necessary to determine the exact effect size.