PubMed · 7001559
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
J F Clayson. 1980. Sub-surface porosity.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7001559/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
One of the most important aspects in the metrology of radiation fields is the problem of the measurement of dose profiles in regions where the dose gradient is large. In such zones, the 'detector size effect' may produce experimental measurements that do not correspond to reality. Mathematically it can be proved, under some general assumptions of spatial linearity, that the disturbance induced in the measurement by the effect of the finite size of the detector is equal to the convolution of the real profile with a representative kernel of the detector. In this work the exact relation between the measured profile and the real profile is shown, through the analytical resolution of the integral equation for a general type of profile fitting function using Gaussian convolution kernels.
In this article we compare the accuracy of a diode laser densitometer emitting 675.2 nm to that of a commercial He-Ne laser densitometer emitting 632.8 nm for GafChromic MD-55 film readout. A Leksell gamma unit (AB Elekta Stockholm, Sweden) Model B with a 14 and 8 mm collimator at the same isocenter (combined 11 mm collimator) was used to irradiate GafChromic MD-55 films. Dose response curves, dose cross profile and FWHM were measured with a custom-designed diode laser scanning device, emitting light at 675.2 nm. The same data were recorded with a commercial He-Ne laser densitometer (PTW FIPS Plus, Freiburg, Germany), emitting light at 632.8 nm. Both measurements were compared to dose cross profiles of a radiosurgery dose planning program (GammaPlan 5.12, Elekta, Sweden). Compared to the commercial He-Ne laser densitometer, the custom-designed diode laser scanning device showed better agreement with the calculated dose cross profile. For two axes, the full width half maxima (FWHM) of the diode laser scanning device was within 0.1 mm deviation compared to the data calculated by the dose planning program. The FWHM of the commercial He-Ne laser densitometer was less accurate (1.6 and 2.1 mm deviation). Our data show that a diode laser scanning device using a light source emitting 675.2 nm increases the accuracy of a GafChromic MD-55 film readout. This greater accuracy may be related to the diode laser measuring the optical density close to maximum absorption of the GafChromic film MD-55 (671-675 nm).
Scatter and veiling glare are predominant sources of error in videodensitometric iodine quantification. Standard beam stop techniques such as lead strips or an array of lead discs, placed before the patients, have previously been used to measure scatter and veiling glare in digital radiographic images. However, these techniques significantly increase patient x-ray exposure. In order to overcome this limitation, a scatter measurement technique based on sampled primary intensity has been investigated. This technique uses an array of apertures in a lead sheet to sample the primary x-ray intensity. The scatter-glare intensity in these locations is calculated by subtracting the sampled primary intensity from an open field image which contains both primary and scatter-glare. The calculated scatter-glare values can be interpolated or combined with digital filtration to estimate the scatter-glare intensity on a pixel by pixel basis. The technique was evaluated using a Lucite step phantom and an anthropomorphic chest phantom. The average rms percentage errors of scatter and veiling glare estimation using bi-cubic interpolation and digital filtration techniques were 8.02% and 7.53%, respectively. The average rms percentage errors of primary intensity estimation using bi-cubic interpolation and digital filtration techniques were 10.01% and 8.91%, respectively. The x-ray exposure-area product (EAP) from the aperture array was only 4.38% of the EAP from the open field. These results indicate that the scatter-glare intensity can be accurately estimated with minimal x-ray exposure using sampled primary intensity.