Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 7000864

Polymorphous light eruption.

Abstract

A review of the available information indicates that the polymorphous light eruptions are characterized by a number of clinical and histologic features. The clinical patterns range from multiple small papules and papulovesicles, which become confluent, to large plaques. The former usually involve all of the sun-exposed areas and the latter frequently are localized to the face. Histologically, the epidermal changes vary with the clinical presentation. However, a perivascular round cell infiltrate in the dermis is present in all of the lesions. The disease has a worldwide distribution, though there is a high incidence in certain populations such as North and Latin American Indians and Finnish people. The disease usually begins in young adult life except in the American Indian population, where it tends to start in childhood. Though in several series there was a preponderance of females, males do develop the problem in significant numbers. The action spectrum falls primarily in the ultraviolet B (UVB) range. Some patients do react to ultraviolet A (UVA) rays as well. However, there is evidence that the process is not confined to any narrow band of radiation, but can be produced by any wavelength or energy source as long as one uses sufficient exposure dose to produce a delayed phototoxic erythema. Pathogenetically, it is likely that polymorphous light eruption (PMLE) actually includes more than one disease entity. Whether photoallergy plays a role in any of these responses remains to be seen. In addition, the relationship to the persistent light reactor, photosensitive eczema, and actinic reticuloid has not been clarified at this time.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J H Epstein. 1980. Polymorphous light eruption.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0190-9622(80)80324-0

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[How I managed peristomal dermatitis].

Peristomal skin irritation is one of the most frequent complication in the ostomate's rehabilitation process. It can and must be avoid through a specialized care. The author makes a literature revision and approaches the causative and associated factors to the skin damage, its classification and the preventive and therapeutical principles in Nursing Stomal therapy.

Dermatitis

Leukotriene B4 and platelet-activating factor in human skin.

Acute inflammatory reactions are characterized by leukocyte infiltration associated with increases in vascular permeability and in local blood flow. Leukocyte infiltration can be induced by chemotactic factors such as leukotriene B4 (LTB4) and paf-acether (formerly known as platelet-activating factor) that can be generated within inflammatory lesions. Vascular permeability and increase in blood flow are also affected by LTB4 and paf-acether, as well as by several other substances, including histamine and prostaglandins. Derived from arachidonic acid via the 5 lipo-oxygenase pathway, LTB4 is one of the most potent leukocyte chemotactic substances known. Intradermal injections of LTB4 induce dermal neutrophil infiltration in animal models and in humans. Topical application of LTB4 to human skin induces intraepidermal micro-abscesses containing numerous intact neutrophils. LTB4 has been found to be increased in psoriatic lesions, but its synthesis by epidermal cells remains undecided. Like other leukotrienes, LTB4 can stimulate DNA synthesis in cultured human epidermal keratinocytes. However, receptors for LTC4 but not for LTB4 have been found on human keratinocytes in culture. Paf-acether is an ether-linked phospholipid identified as 1-O-alkyl-2-O-acetyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine and is considered to be one of the most potent mediators of acute allergic and inflammatory reactions. For instance, intradermal injection of paf-acether induces inflammatory events such as neutrophil infiltration and increase in vascular permeability. Recent data suggest that cutaneous cells, such as fibroblasts and keratinocytes, are capable of producing paf and that paf is released during the development of allergic cutaneous reactions.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Dermatitis

Immunohistochemical examination of lichen nitidus suggests that it is not a localized papular variant of lichen planus.

BACKGROUND: Lichen nitidus is believed, by some, to be a variant of lichen planus, and by others to be a distinct entity. OBJECTIVE: We examined five cases of lichen nitidus with immunohistochemical reagents designed to characterize the dermal inflammatory infiltrate in an attempt to resolve the uncertainty. METHODS: We stained formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections with the following antibodies: L26, A6, KP1, BerH2, OPD4, and HECA-452. RESULTS: The inflammatory infiltrate was 90% A6+, with few L26+ cells. In contrast to lichen planus, KP1+ macrophages were seen and fewer of the lymphocytes demonstrated HECA-452. Fifty percent to 80% of lymphocytes were OPD4 positive, similar to that usually seen in lichen planus. Rare Ki-1+ cells were seen in one case. CONCLUSION: We believe that the pattern of a mixed cellular infiltrate characterized by macrophages and a helper T cell response with few HECA-452+ cells is somewhat different from the pattern seen in lichen planus, wherein almost all of the cells are CD4+/HECA-452+ lymphocytes. This suggests a different immunologic pathogenesis.

Dermatitis