PubMed · 6987100
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
W J O'Brien. 1980. Base retention.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6987100/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Reduced interarch distance, resulted from extrusion of antagonist teeth and/or down growth of alveolar bone due to long-time absence of natural teeth without adequate restoration in this area, is found in many cases. In such condition, it is difficult to fabricate a distal free-end removable partial denture with conventional resin base because of insufficient space for denture base resin, metal framework and artificial teeth, and the long-term prognosis of the denture is questionable due to minimized strength of the denture base. In this article, the authors demonstrate the clinical and laboratory methods and procedures for distal extension removable partial denture construction in reduced interach distance condition. Partial metal base in the insufficient vertical space area of the ordinary denture base is altered, the metal occlusal scheme and buccal resin facing are designed, instead of resin denture teeth. These designs provide strength, esthetic and masticatory function to the denture, and the denture base is convenient for future denture repair or relining.
A study of Young's modulus in flexure of a number of methacrylate polymers indicated that the results were dependent on the test specimen thickness. The Young's modulus calculated from simple bending theory decreased with increased specimen thickness. This effect could not be accounted for either by the usual corrections for shear or corrections for the effect of the width/length ratio. It transpires that the effects noted experimentally are due to the combined effects of shear and the width/length ratio.
The history of denture base materials and the accompanying development of impression techniques are traced from the earliest times to the present day (Part 1) as a prelude to a study (Part 2-4) of the various theories that have been advanced to explain retention of the base without mechanical support. These theories are critically reviewed and tabulated in chronological order. Some areas for further investigation are identified.