Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 6974955

[Emission computed tomography].

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J J de Lima. [Emission computed tomography].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6974955/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Development of the multiple sequence approximation within the AGADIR model of alpha-helix formation: comparison with Zimm-Bragg and Lifson-Roig formalisms.

In this work we present the development of the multiple sequence approximation (AGADIRms) and the standard one-sequence approximation (AGADIRls) within the framework of AGADIR's alpha-helix formation model. The extensive comparison between these new formulations and the original one [AGADIR; V. Muñoz and L. Serrano (1994). Nat. Struct. Biol., Vol. 1, pp. 399-409] indicates that the standard one-sequence approximation is virtually identical to the multiple sequence approximation, while the previously used residue partition function approximation [Muñoz and Serrano (1994); (1995), J. Mol. Biol., Vol. 245, pp. 275-296] is less precise. The calculations of the average helical content performed with AGADIR are precise for peptides of less than 30 residues and progressively diverge from the multiple sequence formulation for longer peptides. The helicity distribution of heteropolypeptides with less than 50% average helical content is also well described, while those of quasi-homopolymers with high helical content tend to be-flattened. These inaccuracies lead to an underestimation of 0.017 kcal/mol for the mean-residue enthalpic contribution in AGADIR, as compared to AGADIRms and AGADIRls. The other energy contributions to alpha-helix stability are not affected by the original statistical approximation. We also discuss the particularities of the model for alpha-helix formation utilized in AGADIR and compare it with the classical Zimm-Bragg and Lifson-Roig theories. Moreover, we develop the mathematical relationships between the basic AGADIR energy contributions and helix nucleation and elongation, which permit the quantitative comparison between formalisms. Remarkably, the comparison between AGADIRms and the Lifson-Roig formalism shows that, despite the differences on treating helix/coil cooperativity, both theories give virtually identical results when an equivalent set of parameters is used. This indicates that the helix/coil transition is a solid theory independent of the particularities of the model for alpha-helix formation.

Mathematics

Modeling dynamic contraction of muscle using the cross-bridge theory.

During normal, voluntary movements, skeletal muscles typically contract in a highly dynamic manner; the length of the muscle and the speed of contraction change continuously. In this study, we present an approach to predict the accurate behavior of muscles for such dynamic contractions using Huxley's cross-bridge model. A numerical procedure is proposed to solye, without any assumptions, the partial differential equation that governs the attachment distribution function in Huxley's cross-bridge model. The predicted attachment distribution functions, and the corresponding force responses for shortening and stretching, were compared with those obtained using Zahalak's analytical solution and those obtained using the so-called "distribution moment model" in transient and steady-state contractions. Compared to the distribution moment model, the solutions obtained using our model are exact rather than approximate. The solutions obtained using the analytical approach and the present approach were virtually identical; however, in terms of CPU times, the present approach was 250-300 times faster than Zahalak's. From the results of this study, we concluded that the proposed solution is an exact and efficient way for solving the partial differential equation governing the cross-bridge model.

Mathematics

Creating phyllotaxis: the stack-and-drag model.

The genesis of phyllotaxis, the origin of the pattern of appendages on the surface just below the apical extreme of many plants, is an old unsolved puzzle. Whereas many models generate helices, the stack-and-drag model is the first to achieve this in an integral construction from seed to flower. Combination of the principle of gnomonic growth, where consecutive additions have comparable positions, with a "dragging" principle, where the developing zone follows the apical tip, provides a powerful tool in simulating a wide range of phyllotactic manifestations. The influence of three vital parameters for primordial size, compressibility, and canalization (or annular arrangement) helps in understanding the problem's nature.

Mathematics