Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 692145

Enzyme-substrate recognition.

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

L Edelstein, R Rosen. 1978-07-06. Enzyme-substrate recognition.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(78)90185-6

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Immunochemical studies on the combining site of the A + N blood type specific Moluccella laevis lectin.

The specificity of the anti A+N lectin of Moluccella laevis (MLL) was examined by hemagglutination experiments with enzyme-modified human erythrocytes and by inhibition of hemagglutination. In addition, binding to various glycoproteins and inhibition by different sugars and glycoproteins were examined by enzyme immunoassay with antibodies to the lectin. Treatment of AMM erythrocytes with proteolytic enzymes increased their agglutinability by MLL 4-16-fold; similar treatment of ONN cells decreased their agglutinability 8-16-fold. This is in line with the known location and enzyme sensitivity of A and N specificity determinants. Treatment of the erythrocytes with sialidase increased their agglutinability and abolished the distinction between N and M cells. Hapten inhibition of hemagglutination of AMM and ONN erythrocytes by the lectin, and its binding to glycoproteins measured by enzyme immunoassay, confirmed the high specificity of MLL for N-acetyl-D-galactosamine (200-500 times more than for D-galactose) and suggested the presence of hydrophobic interactions around HO-2 of the D-galactose unit. The methyl alpha-glycosides of D-galactose and of N-acetyl-D-galactosamine were better inhibitors than the corresponding beta-glycosides; this preference was abolished, and sometimes reversed, when the p-nitrophenyl glycosides of the same monosaccharides were tested, stressing again the importance of hydrophobic interactions in the binding of carbohydrates to MLL. The lectin reacted well with ONN substance and with glycophorin A of the N phenotype (GPAN), but did not react with OMM substance or GPAM. The strongest inhibitor was asialo ovine submaxillary mucin, which contains many unsubstituted alpha-D-GalpNAc-(1-->3)-Ser/Thr residues; calculated per N-acetyl-D-galactosamine residue, it was 1500 stronger than free N-acetyl-D-galactosamine. In accordance with this result, it was found that the lectin strongly agglutinates Tn cells. The specificity of MLL can, thus, be defined as anti-Tn, crossreactive with blood types A and N, and with sialosyl-Tn. The N-specificity can best be explained by assuming that GPAN contains a small number of unsubstituted or partially sialylated alpha-D-GalpNAc-(1-->3)-Ser/Thr residues, which are present in smaller proportions, if at all, in GPAM.

Antibody Specificity

[Kidney transplantation in hyperimmunized patients ignoring the cross-match performed with historic sera].

To ignore the positivity of renal pretransplantation cross-match performed with peak sera remains a controversial practice. The present study concerns 11 renal transplantations after positive cross-match with peak sera and negative cross-match with current sera. The clinical results of these transplantations lead to the assumption that peak sera contained HLA antibodies not specific to the graft and non HLA antibodies responsible for the positivity of the cross-match.

Antibody Specificity

MHC associations of autoantibodies against recombinant Ro and La proteins in systemic lupus erythematosus. Results of a multicenter study. SLE Study Group.

Antibodies against recombinant 52 kD-Ro, recombinant 60 kD-Ro and recombinant La protein were determined by ELISA in over 300 central European patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). A strong association with HLA-DR3 was found for antibodies against 52 kD-Ro and La, but not for recombinant 60 kD-Ro antibodies in the absence of antibodies against 52 kD-Ro or La. Ro/La negative SLE patients still showed an increased frequency of HLA-DR3 as compared to healthy controls. These results indicated that the preferential formation of Ro and La antibodies was not due to an unspecific stimulatory effect of HLA-DR3 but that the antibody response to certain defined proteins (52 kD-Ro and La) was influenced by MHC genes in SLE. Furthermore, the association of SLE with HLA-DR3 was independent of the effects of DR3 on the formation of 52 kD-Ro and La antibodies.

Antibody Specificity