PubMed · 6919367
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
1982-02-11. [Liability cases: wrong solution given with catheterization].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6919367/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
We studied bactericidal activity of 10% povidone-iodine, 0.5% chlorhexidine gluconate, and 0.5% chlorhexidine in 80% ethanol on four strains of methicillin-resistant and two strains of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus. The pathogen was exposed to each of the disinfectants for 15, 30, 60, 120, and 240 s at room temperature. The inocula from these suspensions were cultured 72 h at 37 degrees C after the antimicrobial activity of the disinfectants in the suspensions was inactivated by 1:1000 dilution with neutralizer. No organism grew in any of the strains after exposure to 0.5% chlorhexidine in 80% ethanol. The 15-, 30-, and 60-s exposure to 10% povidone-iodine reduced the mean colony count by 55.2%, 91.2%, and 96.7%, respectively, and the exposures to 0.5% chlorhexidine gluconate reduced the mean colony count by 37.2%, 77.1%, and 93.3%, respectively. The difference in colony count between disinfectants was significant at 15- and 30-s exposures (P < 0.01 and 0.05, respectively). The results suggest that bactericidal activity of 0.5% chlorhexidine in 80% ethanol is more potent and more rapid against methicillin-susceptible and methicillin-resistant strains of S. aureus.
The efficacy of oral hygiene agents in preventing the accumulation of plaque from a zero baseline is conveniently evaluated in the 4-day plaque regrowth model. In many studies a panel of volunteers has been used to compare several agents according to a highly efficient Latin square based crossover design. Often chlorhexidine gluconate is included as a positive control; there is concern that the effect of this potent agent might persist for longer than the 3-day washout period often employed. To test this hypothesis of residual effect, we put together the evidence relating to possible carryover from 12 studies. The residual effect of chlorhexidine differs from that of an inert rinse such as saline or water. Consequently, a longer washout period, such as 10 days, is preferable. Studies omitting chlorhexidine are worth considering. Designs should be balanced for residual effects, at least from the preceding treatment period; several useful designs with this property are presented.
Cytotoxic chemotherapy and radiation therapy damage normal body tissues, resulting in stomatitis, conjunctivitis, esophagitis, proctitis, and dermatitis. Pursuant to this, the North Central Cancer Treatment Group has developed a series of clinical trials designed to study antidotes for these pathologic processes. These trials have demonstrated clinically helpful therapies (eg, oral cryotherapy for decreasing mucositis induced by 5-fluorouracil) and also have demonstrated lack of benefit for other proposed treatments. Results from several ongoing clinical trials should become available in the near future.