Integration misunderstood.

Abstract

Yates's (1983) criticisms of the possibility of integrating psychodynamic and behavioural perspectives are critically examined. Some of Yates's arguments hold only for integration with a classical intrapsychic version of psychoanalysis, not for an interpersonal psychodynamic perspective. Yates confuses a demonstration of differences between psychodynamic and behavioural views with an argument that they cannot be put together as part of a higher order synthesis. Issue is taken with Yates's contention that beliefs held 'tenaciously' and 'in spite of the empirical evidence available' are the best path to scientific progress.