Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 6839264

On evaluating patient satisfaction: methodological issues.

Abstract

The survey of patient satisfaction with the mental health services provided is recommended but involves a methodological dilemma. Concerns include a definition problem, the delineation of a representative sample, the selection of a survey technique and the type of questions to be used. A literature review and the authors' own experience with the process are presented. The investigation of patient satisfaction while, as yet, limited in the critical information it can provide for the evaluation of services, will help pinpoint areas where the most patient dissatisfaction exists. The process can also be useful therapeutically, but patient satisfaction, although an important outcome measure, is not systematically related to other measures of treatment success. Methodological suggestions to improve the validity of the data gathered conclude the paper.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

N el-Guebaly, J Toews, A Leckie, D Harper. 1983. On evaluating patient satisfaction: methodological issues.. https://doi.org/10.1177/070674378302800106

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Validation of data on commitments to mental hospitals. How many persons were committed annually?].

The purpose was to validate data on commitments from the Danish Psychiatric Case Register and police statistics. From 1 January 1996 to 31 December 1996, 25.8% (437 commitments) of all commitments in Denmark were investigated. In 347 (79.4%) cases the commitment was recorded as such both in the register and police statistics. Thirty (6.9%) commitments could not be found in the register. Sixty (13.7%) admissions were recorded as involuntary by the police but as voluntary in the register. Medical records were available in 53 of these 60 cases and showed that in 46 cases the police record was correct, i.e. the patient had been committed, and in seven cases the register was correct, i.e. the patient had been admitted voluntarily. This difference in correct registration was statistically significant (p < 0.02). The study concludes that police statistics seem more correct than the Psychiatric Case Register. This is mainly due to insufficient reporting by the psychiatric departments to te register. For register data to be used in administration, planning and research, this must be improved.

Commitment of Persons with Psychiatric Disorders