A theoretical and experimental study concerning shape processing by human visual system.

C Bonciocat

PubMed · 6794055

A theoretical and experimental study concerning shape processing by human visual system.

Abstract

The shape, as a synthetic feature resulting from the particular contour of a figure, may be considered to specify certain spatial relations between the figure domain and surrounding domain. For the study of these relations the figure and the background were considered to belong to a single plane. A characteristic feature of figure-ground relations depending on the figure as a whole was introduced, the "degree of isolation" of the figure from the surrounding ground, with its opposite feature, the "degree of dispersion" into the surrounding ground. A model was elaborated in which the parts radiating from the nucleus of the figure are considered to contribute to the whole figure in inverse proportion to their distance from the nucleus. The corresponding mathematical approach was the convolution between the characteristic function of the figure and a function depending in inverse proportion on the distance from the convolution center (f=1/2 pi r). The maximum value of this convolution integral divided by the radius of the circle having the same area as the figure was introduced as a measure of the degree of isolation of the figure from the surrounding domain. Using symmetrical figures varying in their shape it was found that normal individuals are able to distinguish small differences in this shape parameter and that their evaluations are in good agreement with those predicted by the theoretical model.

Explore related subjects

Form Perception Humans Pattern Recognition, Visual Visual Perception Journal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

C Bonciocat. A theoretical and experimental study concerning shape processing by human visual system.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6794055/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2000

Apparent position governs contour-element binding by the visual system.

An assumption inherent in many models of visual space is that the spatial coordinates of retinal cells implicitly give rise to the perceptual code for position. The results of the experiments reported here, in which it is shown that retinally non-veridical locations of contour elements are used by the visual system for contour-element binding, lend support to a different view. The visual system does not implicitly code position with reference to the labelled locations of retinal cells, but dynamically extracts spatial position from the aggregate result of local computations. These computations may include local spatial relationships between retinal cells, but are not confined to them; other computations, including position derived from local velocity cues, are combined to code the position of objects in the visual world.

Form Perception↗

PubMed2000

Monocular symmetry is neither necessary nor sufficient for the dichoptic perception of bilateral symmetry.

Barlow and Reeves [1979. Vision Research, 19, 783-793] showed that bilateral symmetry detection in dot patterns is about equally efficient whether the displays are viewed monocularly or binocularly. If there is a binocular process which can be stimulated monocularly, this experiment does not indicate whether symmetry detection occurs before or after the site of binocular integration. This is so because the symmetrical patterns would have stimulated both monocular and binocular mechanisms under both viewing conditions. We presented stereoscopic 20-dot patterns, ten dots to each eye, for 150 ms so that 'false fusion' rather than rivalry occurred. Any axis of symmetry in the patterns was oriented at vertical (90 degrees ) or +/-1, 2, 3, or 4 degrees from vertical. The task was to judge whether the axis was tilted left or right of vertical, using the method of constant stimulus differences. Three kinds of pattern were used: SSS patterns were symmetrical in each eye alone and also dichoptically; NNS patterns were random monocularly but dichoptically symmetrical; and SSN patterns were symmetrical monocularly but dichoptically non-symmetrical. Orientation judgements were accurate, and equally so, for SSS and NNS displays but were extremely poor under SSN conditions. A control experiment showed that the poor performance in the SSN condition was not due to the axes of symmetry being eccentric to the fixation point. Thus, monocular symmetry is neither necessary nor sufficient for dichoptic bilateral symmetry perception; and symmetry mechanisms have no access to monocular signals.

Form Perception↗

PubMed2000

Seeing circles: what limits shape perception?

Humans are remarkably adept at judging shapes and discriminating forms. Forms and shapes are initially sampled by discrete localized visual filters (or receptive fields) in 'early' stages of visual processing. However, more complex higher level filters which integrate or pool information from many local filters may be needed to discern shapes. In order to understand the mechanisms that limit shape perception we asked observers to detect distortions in the shape of briefly presented circles constructed out of samples (Gabor patches, which are well matched to the early visual filters), and varied the radius of the circle, and the number and orientation of the samples. Our results show that shape perception is determined by two factors: the primary determinant is the separation between the samples; however, the orientation of the samples can modulate performance. At small separations, performance is best when the samples are aligned with the global shape, poorer when they are orthogonal, and intermediate when they are all horizontal or vertical. At larger separations these contextual differences disappear; however at all separations, performance is reduced when the orientations of the samples are mixed (i.e. each sample is randomly either aligned or orthogonal, or randomly either horizontal or vertical.). These results suggest an important role for sample separation in shape perception for sampled shapes and suggest that the mechanisms involved in feature binding may modulate the responses of the mechanisms underlying shape perception.

Form Perception↗