Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 6734252

Consensual accommodation.

Abstract

Consensual accommodation, like other consensual responses, may be a useful diagnostic indicator. The consensual interocular lag (direct accommodative response minus consensual accommodative response) was measured under a variety of accommodative conditions in four normal subjects, one of whom later underwent cryosurgery for a retinal tear. There was no consensual interocular lag when subjects were orthophoric , but when slightly exophoric at near distances a small lag does occur. A subject with large exophorias at near showed a more complex accommodative pattern. The consensual interocular lag proved to be the most sensitive measure of accommodative loss and subsequent recovery after retinal cryosurgery.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

F Thorn, M Grennan, D Heath. 1984. Consensual accommodation.. https://doi.org/10.3109/02713688409065592

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

The role of the ocular lens in the regulation of intraocular pressure.

The relationship between lenticular colloid osmotic (oncotic) pressure and intraocular pressure is discussed, with particular reference to a postulated buffering reservoir action of the lens in protecting against acute changes in intraocular pressure. A hypothesis is developed regarding acute lenticular volume changes in those species manifesting change in lens shape during accommodation. The unusually high colloid osmotic pressure of fish lenses is discussed and related to their unique means of accommodation and their susceptibility to cataract formation.

Accommodation, Ocular

Partly accommodative esotropia. Should you overcorrect and cut the plus?

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the long-term motor stability and sensory outcome of patients with partly accommodative esotropia who were overcorrected surgically and in whom the hyperopic correction was reduced postoperatively, and to determine if those results depended on the amount of hyperopia present. DESIGN: A 15-year prospective study that analyzed 5-year outcome. Patients whose esotropia was not initially overcorrected were used as controls. PATIENTS: Of 382 patients who underwent surgery for partly accommodative esotropia, 22 were surgically overcorrected and were followed up for 5 years. RESULTS: Of the eight patients in the study group with 2.5 diopters or less of hyperopia in their fixing eye, seven had good motor alignment compared with four of 14 patients who had more than 2.5 diopters of hyperopia. Ninety-one percent (148/163) of the control patients who had greater than 2.5 diopters of hyperopia maintained good motor alignment 5 years after surgery compared with 29% of the study group patients. This difference was statistically significant. Of the eight study patients with less than 2.5 diopters of hyperopia, five developed good stereopsis compared with one of 14 patients with greater hyperopia. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical overcorrection in patients with partly accommodative esotropia with greater than 2.5 diopters of hyperopia may not be reversible by postoperative reduction in the hyperopic correction. It often is reversible, however, in patients with 2.5 diopters or less of hyperopia.

Accommodation, Ocular

The optics of the eye-lens and lenticular senescence. A review.

Although the lens of the eye is structurally a biological tissue, it functions as an optical element providing one third of the refracting power of the human eye, and a variable focus in younger years. Throughout a life-time the optical properties of the eye-lens alter, resulting in changes in function: there is a gradual depletion of the focussing amplitude from infancy to middle age, and a loss of transmittance in the later decades of life. The optical properties of the lens depend on its power, which in turn is determined by its physical dimensions (curvatures and thickness) and its refractive index as well as transmissivity and the organization of its internal components. The power of the functional lens is, however, modifiable by virtue of the lens being attached via the zonule to the ciliary muscle. The contraction and relaxation of the latter respectively increases and decreases lens power in accordance with innervations determined by the physical distance of external objects to be imaged on the retina. This review will consider many of these features and how alterations in any of them may lead to changes in lenticular function. However, as we have recently devoted a detailed study to presbyopia [1] its mechanism will not be considered here.

Accommodation, Ocular