PubMed · 6723534
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
W Dihlmann. 1984-05-18. [Lumbar computerized tomography].. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2008-1069276
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
OBJECTIVES: This systematic review and meta-analysis are aimed at evaluating the incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) following administration of clinically approved ultrasound contrast agents (UCAs) in adults and children, to assess risks in patients with cardiovascular disease and in pregnancy, and to evaluate the effectiveness of emergency management of severe ADRs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A PRISMA 2020 systematic review was conducted searching PubMed, Scopus, and Embase. Two reviewers independently screened, extracted data, and assessed quality. Incidence estimates were pooled when feasible, stratified by age group, contrast agent, and administration route. RESULTS: Seventy-four studies encompassing > 1 million adults and > 36,000 children were included, contributing multiple analytic cohorts to the quantitative synthesis. Severe acute ADRs were extremely rare (6 and 16 cases per 100,000 in adults and children, respectively) and absent following endocavitary administration in children. Non-severe acute ADRs occurred in 11 and 8 cases per 10,000 adults and children, respectively. Delayed reactions were very rare (< 1 case per million in adults). No significant safety differences emerged between UCA products. The incidence of ADRs in patients with cardiovascular disease was analogous to the general population. No ADRs were reported in pregnant women. Standard emergency management was effective in almost all serious cases, though rare fatalities occurred. CONCLUSION: UCAs show an excellent safety profile in adults and children, with very rare severe ADRs and few non-severe, typically self-limiting reactions. Strict adherence to recommended emergency management protocols mitigates the remaining risks, supporting safe use across a broad range of clinical indications. PROSPERO REGISTRATION: CRD42023432668. KEY POINTS: Question What is the incidence, type, and severity of acute and delayed ADRs associated with clinically approved UCAs across different patient populations? Findings Severe acute adverse reactions are very rare, and non-severe reactions are rare and self-limiting, with no significant safety differences between adults, children, or patients with cardiovascular disease. Clinical relevant UCAs show an excellent safety profile across populations. These findings support their safe clinical use as reliable alternatives to iodine-based and gadolinium-based contrast agents in routine diagnostic imaging.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVE: We performed this study to evaluate the incidence and significance of ring enhancement after i.v. administration of an ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide (USPIO) particle (Code 7227), a reticuloendothelial contrast agent with potential use as a blood-pool agent, for characterizing focal hepatic lesions. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Conventional T1-weighed imaging, fat-suppressed T1-weighted imaging, conventional T2-weighted imaging, and fast T2-weighted imaging of the liver were obtained in 27 patients with 43 liver lesions before and after i.v. administration of a USPIO preparation. All lesions were larger than 1 cm; 29 were malignant and 14 were benign. Diagnosis was confirmed in all cases, either pathologically (19 patients) or by follow-up examination (eight patients). Two readers independently evaluated each pulse sequence for the presence of ring enhancement of hepatic lesions. RESULTS: Ring enhancement was noted only on T1-weighted images, with no ring enhancement evident on T2-weighted images. Twenty of 43 (47%) lesions showed ring enhancement, including 18 of 29 (62%) malignant lesions and two of 14 (14%) benign lesions (p < .011); Wilcoxon signed rank test). Fat-suppressed T1-weighted imaging showed ring enhancement better than or equal to conventional T1-weighted imaging in all cases, with ring enhancement of 15 of 18 (83%) malignant lesions and two of two benign lesions better demonstrated on fat-suppressed T1-weighted imaging sequences (p < or = .025). CONCLUSION: Ring enhancement after i.v. administration of Code 7227 is a frequent finding seen more often with malignant than benign lesions, potentially identifying a new MR imaging feature for the characterization of liver lesions. The identification of ring enhancement on T1-weighted images attests to the significant blood-pool effects of USPIO particles.