Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 6703717

[Phase I clinical study].

Abstract

The main purpose of the phase I clinical study is to define the tolerable doses in each various administration schedules depend upon by careful clinical observations and by pharmaco-kinetic, -dynamic studies. final goal of the phase I clinical study is to establish the safe, most reasonable administration schedules to perform further clinical studies, including phase II, III and possibly iv. In addition, it is quite reasonable to observe efficacy of the given agent if possible. The patients who are selected to receive the phase I clinical study should be fulfilled the followings: (1) Histological proof of malignancy; (2) No best available therapy regimen at present; (3) Maintain reasonably well organ functions which are suitable to observe side reactions (4) No hang-over reactions from previous therapy and; (5) Consent from patient himself or members of the family concerning the study. The set-up of the initial administration dose should be established from mouse and dog preclinical studies. Retrospective studies revealed reasonably safe and efficient to start from the most sensitive dose in 1/5 LD10 of mouse or 1/5 TDL of dog on the mg square meter basis. Above method is widely used at present and it is a potential replacement for the large animal species as a routine procedure. Dose escalation routinely proceeded using a double dose escalation procedure or modified Fibonacci procedures with minimal risk. It is permitted to escalate administration dose in the same patient under careful considerations. The new agent which has enough reliable clinical date in the abroad, the clinical study in this country would be simplified. The phase I clinical study should be performed in the well-equipped institutions under the supervision of capable investigators. The guide line of phase I clinical study would be revised whenever it is necessary.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

H Majima. 1984. [Phase I clinical study].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6703717/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Deep generative neural network for accurate drug response imputation.

Drug response differs substantially in cancer patients due to inter- and intra-tumor heterogeneity. Particularly, transcriptome context, especially tumor microenvironment, has been shown playing a significant role in shaping the actual treatment outcome. In this study, we develop a deep variational autoencoder (VAE) model to compress thousands of genes into latent vectors in a low-dimensional space. We then demonstrate that these encoded vectors could accurately impute drug response, outperform standard signature-gene based approaches, and appropriately control the overfitting problem. We apply rigorous quality assessment and validation, including assessing the impact of cell line lineage, cross-validation, cross-panel evaluation, and application in independent clinical data sets, to warrant the accuracy of the imputed drug response in both cell lines and cancer samples. Specifically, the expression-regulated component (EReX) of the observed drug response achieves high correlation across panels. Using the well-trained models, we impute drug response of The Cancer Genome Atlas data and investigate the features and signatures associated with the imputed drug response, including cell line origins, somatic mutations and tumor mutation burdens, tumor microenvironment, and confounding factors. In summary, our deep learning method and the results are useful for the study of signatures and markers of drug response.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

Favorable response of intraommaya topotecan for leptomeningeal metastasis of neuroblastoma after intravenous route failure.

A 3-year-old male, diagnosed with stage 4 neuroblastoma, developed recurrent leptomeningeal metastasis after multi-modality treatment including multi-agent chemotherapy, surgery, high dose chemotherapy plus stem cell rescue, cis-retinoic acid and intravenous (IV) topotecan. He then received intraommaya (IO) topotecan three times weekly (maximum dose; 0.4 mg). A complete response was achieved by a resolution of malignant cells in cerebrospinal fluid and resolution leptomeningeal enhancement by brain MRI. Treatment toxicities included low-grade fever and minimal headache. The duration of treatment response from IO topotecan was 18 weeks. The survival time from CNS recurrence in this patient was 13 months. We suggest IO topotecan be considered for neoplastic meningitis of tumors with known sensitivity to topotecan.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

Mobilization of Ph chromosome-negative peripheral blood stem cells in a child with chronic myeloid leukemia after imatinib-induced complete molecular remission.

Chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) is rare in the pediatric population. Allogeneic stem cell transplant remains the only curative therapy; however, identifying a fully matched donor is not always possible. Imatinib mesylate has been shown to induce hematologic and cytogenetic response in adults and children with CML. We describe a child who achieved molecular remission with imatinib mesylate. BCR-ABL negative peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) were successfully collected after mobilization with filgrastim.

Antineoplastic Agents↗