Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 6699293

Frequency and intensity difference limens for harmonics within complex tones.

Abstract

A two-interval, two-alternative forced choice task was used to estimate frequency difference limens (DLs) for individual harmonics within complex tones, and DLs for the periodicity (i.e., number of periods per s) of the whole complexes. For complex tones with equal-amplitude harmonics, the DLs for the lowest harmonics were small (less than one percent). The DLs increased rather abruptly around the fifth to seventh harmonic. The highest harmonic in each complex was also well discriminated, and the discriminability of a single high harmonic was markedly improved by increasing its level relative to the other components. The DL for a complex tone was generally smaller than the frequency DL of its most discriminable component. The DL for a complex was found to be predictable from the DLs of the harmonics comprising the complex, using a formula derived by Goldstein [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 54, 1496-1516 (1973)] from his optimum processor theory for the formation of the pitch of complex tones. The DL for a complex is sometimes primarily determined by high harmonics, such as the highest harmonic, or a harmonic whose level exceeds that of adjacent harmonics. We also measured intensity DLs for individual harmonics within complex tones. The intensity DLs were smallest for low harmonic numbers, and for the highest harmonic in a complex. An excitation-pattern model was used to determine whether the frequency DLs of harmonics within complex tones could be explained in terms of place mechanisms, i.e., in terms of changes in the amount of excitation at appropriate frequency places. We conclude that place mechanisms are not adequate, and that information about the frequencies of individual harmonics is probably carried in the time patterning of neural impulses.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

B C Moore, B R Glasberg, M J Shailer. 1984. Frequency and intensity difference limens for harmonics within complex tones.. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.390527

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Hearing lips and seeing voices: how cortical areas supporting speech production mediate audiovisual speech perception.

Observing a speaker's mouth profoundly influences speech perception. For example, listeners perceive an "illusory" "ta" when the video of a face producing /ka/ is dubbed onto an audio /pa/. Here, we show how cortical areas supporting speech production mediate this illusory percept and audiovisual (AV) speech perception more generally. Specifically, cortical activity during AV speech perception occurs in many of the same areas that are active during speech production. We find that different perceptions of the same syllable and the perception of different syllables are associated with different distributions of activity in frontal motor areas involved in speech production. Activity patterns in these frontal motor areas resulting from the illusory "ta" percept are more similar to the activity patterns evoked by AV(/ta/) than they are to patterns evoked by AV(/pa/) or AV(/ka/). In contrast to the activity in frontal motor areas, stimulus-evoked activity for the illusory "ta" in auditory and somatosensory areas and visual areas initially resembles activity evoked by AV(/pa/) and AV(/ka/), respectively. Ultimately, though, activity in these regions comes to resemble activity evoked by AV(/ta/). Together, these results suggest that AV speech elicits in the listener a motor plan for the production of the phoneme that the speaker might have been attempting to produce, and that feedback in the form of efference copy from the motor system ultimately influences the phonetic interpretation.

Auditory Perception↗

Top-down processes during auditory phoneme categorization in dyslexia: a PET study.

While persistence of subtle phonological deficits in dyslexic adults is well documented, deficit of categorical perception of phonemes has received little attention so far. We studied learning of phoneme categorization during an activation H(2)O(15) PET experiment in 14 dyslexic adults and 16 normal readers with similar age, handedness and performance IQ. Dyslexic subjects exhibited typical, marked impairments in reading and phoneme awareness tasks. During the PET experiment, subjects performed a discrimination task involving sine wave analogues of speech first presented as pairs of electronic sounds and, after debriefing, as syllables /ba/ and /da/. Discrimination performance and brain activation were compared between the acoustic mode and the speech mode of the task which involved physically identical stimuli; signal changes in the speech mode relative to the acoustic mode revealed the neural counterparts of phonological top-down processes that are engaged after debriefing. Although dyslexic subjects showed good abilities to learn discriminating speech sounds, their performance remained lower than those of normal readers on the discrimination task over the whole experiment. Activation observed in the speech mode in normal readers showed a strongly left-lateralized pattern involving the superior temporal, inferior parietal and inferior lateral frontal cortex. Frontal and parietal subparts of these left-sided regions were significantly more activated in the control group than in the dyslexic group. Activations in the right frontal cortex were larger in the dyslexic group than in the control group for both speech and acoustic modes relative to rest. Dyslexic subjects showed an unexpected large deactivation in the medial occipital cortex for the acoustic mode that may reflect increased effortful attention to auditory stimuli.

Auditory Perception↗