Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 6654250

[Episiotomy].

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D Levran, S Mashiach. 1983. [Episiotomy].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6654250/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Episiotomy in Nigeria.

OBJECTIVE: To review the incidence and complications associated with episiotomy and perineal tears at the University of Benin Teaching Hospital, Benin City, Nigeria. METHOD: A retrospective review of all vaginal births conducted in the hospital between January 1997 and December 1998 was undertaken. Vaginal births (1345) were reviewed. RESULT: The prevalence of episiotomy in the hospital during the period was 46.6%. Over 90% of primigravid parturients had episiotomy. The incidence of episiotomy decreased with increasing parity, while the incidence of spontaneous vaginal tears increased with parity. As compared with perineal tears, episiotomy was associated with a statistically significant increased risk of wound breakdowns requiring secondary resuturing. When controlled for parity, breech births, forceps and vacuum delivery were more likely to lead to episiotomy, compared to spontaneous vertex delivery occurring at term. CONCLUSION: A policy of systematic reduction in the incidence of episiotomy can be pursued in this hospital. Greater attention needs to be paid to selection of women to undergo episiotomy, the prevention of spontaneous perineal tears and the care of episiotomy wounds in this institution.

Episiotomy

Much ado about a little cut: is episiotomy worthwhile?

Methods to prevent perineal trauma during childbirth include avoiding episiotomy and forceps delivery and slowing delivery of the head to allow the perineum time to stretch. Each intervention can lengthen the second stage of labor and change the biophysical stresses on infants and the pelvic floor. Available evidence supports the belief that the interventions are safe for infants and do not lead to significant short- or long-term maternal morbidity. We should abandon the conventional teaching that a longer second stage and perineal stretching are harmful. Routine episiotomy is no longer advisable. Forces that might inhibit physicians from practicing evidence-based techniques of obstetric delivery include time pressures, malpractice concerns, lack of experience with slow perineal stretching, and an interventionist practice pattern. Changes in practice can be effectively introduced through consumer pressures, opinion leaders, and in teaching institutions, by house staff.

Episiotomy