Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 6648319

Latency differences between ipsilateral and contralateral auditory brainstem responses.

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

F Debruyne. 1983. Latency differences between ipsilateral and contralateral auditory brainstem responses.. https://doi.org/10.3109/01050398309076250

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Acoustic neuroma in patients with completely resolved sudden hearing loss.

Approximately 30% of patients with sudden hearing loss show complete recovery. Researchers have long questioned whether extensive evaluation is necessary in these cases. Recently, however, with the increasing widespread application of magnetic resonance imaging, a higher rate than expected of acoustic neuromas has been detected in patients with sudden hearing loss. Two studies have suggested that affected patients may even partially regain hearing. The aim of the present clinical study was to determine whether acoustic neuroma-induced hearing loss may be associated with full recovery. The files of 67 patients evaluated for sudden hearing loss at Rabin Medical Center from 1989 to 2000 were reviewed. All patients underwent pure tone audiometry, acoustic reflex tests, and auditory brain stem evoked response tests. Hearing evaluation was followed by magnetic resonance imaging scan and, 1 month later, a second hearing test. Findings were compared between patients with and without evidence of tumor on imaging, and between patients with tumor with and without full recovery. Twenty-four patients (36%) had a diagnosis of acoustic tumor, of whom 4 (16.7%) recovered hearing after 1 month. All 4 tumors were intracanalicular. Two of these patients had low-tone hearing loss, and 2 had flat curves; 3 had a pathological auditory brain stem evoked response. Of the 43 patients without tumors, 26 (60%) showed complete resolution of the hearing loss. We conclude that complete recovery of hearing loss does not exclude acoustic tumor, and these patients therefore require full evaluation. The reason for the recovery remains unclear.

Audiometry, Evoked Response↗

Epidemiology of early hearing loss detection in Hawaii.

OBJECTIVE: Universal Newborn Hearing Screening began in 2 Honolulu hospitals in 1992, and by 1999, all 14 civilian birthing facilities in Hawaii were providing screening. Examination of 1998 Hawaii data indicated that approximately 13% of infants who did not pass initial hearing screening in the hospital did not return for the indicated follow-up. The purpose of this study was to determine the epidemiologic profile of infants who were born in 1999 and did not return for follow-up. METHODS: A population-based, cohort study of the hearing screening completion rates among the 13 civilian birthing facilities in Hawaii that provided data to the Department of Health was conducted. Analysis included a bivariate analysis of the demographic characteristics of infants who completed the screening/follow-up process compared with those who did not and logistic regression modeling to ascertain the demographic profile of infants at high risk for being lost to follow-up. RESULTS: Of 12 456 infants, hearing screening data could be linked to the birth certificate file, and a final disposition regarding completion of the screening/follow-up process was determined for 10 328 (83%). Less than 2% (n = 176) of the linked infants failed to complete the screening/follow-up procedures. Low birth weight and white infants and infants born to women who had not completed high school were approximately twice as likely not to complete the screening as were their normal birth weight or nonwhite counterparts. CONCLUSIONS: Failure to complete the hearing screening follow-up may be related to cultural differences that have been previously reported in other maternal and child health studies of the diverse populations in Hawaii. The results of this study will allow the Hawaii Newborn Hearing Screening Program to target its efforts and limited resources toward infants who are at higher risk of not completing the screening and who may need special attention to encourage their mothers to complete the screening process, and to move quickly with rescreening infants whose initial tests are positive so that infants are not lost to follow-up.

Audiometry, Evoked Response↗

Distortion evoked otoacoustic emission using GSI 70 analyzer for neonatal screening.

OBJECTIVE: Following the recommendation of the United State National Institute of Health Consensus Conference in 1993, otoacoustic emissions (OAE) are now used internationally for hearing screening. The GSI 70 OAE screener provides the means for carrying out OAE recordings within a short period of time and includes an automatic evaluation of results. The aim of this study was to determine the reliability of recordings in comparison with available standards in brainstem audiometry. METHOD: OAE recorded in 29 hearing-impaired suspected infants and young children (aged 1 months-7 years old) in order to compare the result of the GSI 70 screener with the result of ABR. This study was conducted in the outpatient clinic of the Tokyo University Hospital. RESULT: Our study showed that the GSI 70 screener has higher false negative rate compared with ABR results (P<0.01). Consequently, an OAE measuring method, is also provides high sensitivity and easy to use. However, there was no trend toward increased refer rates with increased age. CONCLUSION: Our findings show that the GSI 70 screener can meet the demands of systematic hearing screening in infants and young children, although there is a tendency to miss cochlear impaired cases.

Audiometry, Evoked Response↗