PubMed · 663713
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
C W Israel. 1978. Kayser-Flelscher ring.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/663713/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
The worldwide shortage of organs and tissue for transplant has led to many ethical discussions involving restrictions concerning organ and tissue donation, including living donations and payment for donation. Efforts are being made to increase the donor pool; however, it is timely to ask whether moral decisions such as the rejection of directed donations are defensible. In this Clinical Conundrum, six specialists delve into the ethical and practical issues surrounding directed donation of human organs and tissues with particular reference to its implications in the field of ophthalmology.
PURPOSE: Corneal confocal microscopy is a reiterative, rapid, noninvasive in vivo clinical examination technique capable of imaging corneal nerve fibers. Nerve fiber tortuosity may indicate a degenerative and attempted regenerative response of nerve fibers to diabetes. The purpose of this study was to define alterations in the tortuosity of corneal nerve fibers in relation to age, duration of diabetes, glycemic control, and neuropathic severity. METHODS: The cornea and collected images of the subbasal nerve plexus of 18 diabetic patients (stratified into mild, moderate, and severe neuropathic groups using conventional clinical measures of neuropathy) and 18 age-matched nondiabetic control subjects were scanned, and a novel mathematical paradigm was applied to quantify the extent of nerve tortuosity, which was termed the tortuosity coefficient (TC). RESULTS: TC was significantly different between the four clinical groups (F(3) = 12.2, P < 0.001). It was significantly greater in the severe neuropathic group than in control subjects (P < 0.003) and in the mild (P < 0.004) and moderate (P < 0.01) neuropathic groups. TC did not correlate significantly with the age (r = -0.003, P > 0.05), duration of diabetes (r = -0.219, P > 0.05), or hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c; r = 0.155, P > 0.05) of diabetic patients. CONCLUSIONS: Corneal confocal microscopy allows rapid, noninvasive in vivo evaluation of corneal nerve tortuosity. This morphologic abnormality relates to the severity of somatic neuropathy and may reflect an alteration in the degree of degeneration and regeneration in diabetes.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the usefulness of corneal esthesiometry for screening diabetic retinopathy. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was carried out comprising 575 patients attending a diabetic retinopathy-screening program in the city of São Paulo. Corneal esthesiometry was assessed with the Cochet-Bonnet esthesiometer. The presence of diabetic retinopathy was detected with indirect fundoscopy. The validity of corneal esthesiometry in identifying diabetic retinopathy was evaluated by the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve. RESULTS: Sensitivity and specificity analyses of the corneal esthesiometry for detecting the stages of diabetic retinopathy using different cut-offs showed values less than 80%. The best indices (72.2% sensitivity and 57.4% specificity) were obtained for the identification of patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy. CONCLUSIONS: In the study series, corneal esthesiometry was not a good indicator of diabetic retinopathy.