Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 6567717

A program to prepare prospective school nurses.

Abstract

In using case presentation as a means to integrate the three roles, a case example might be as follows: A child fell on the playground and cut his chin, which obviously needed stitches. The parents, because of their religious beliefs, were unwilling to accept medical assistance. To help prospective school nurses find a solution to this problem, they are first asked to use the nursing process to assess the child and the situation. Then, they are asked to discuss school policies and procedures related to this type of situation. Following these steps, students are asked to evaluate their value systems and how their values may affect their decision-making ability. Decisions they must make include determining the extent of the injury, conversing with the parents, deciding which school personnel need to be notified, and forming a final plan of care for the child. To complete requirements for initial certification, students submit names of school personnel, parents, students and their supervising nurse who, with the instructor, evaluate their final performance. Competencies are graded on a pass-fail basis with an opportunity to rewrite if necessary. A letter grade for the course is based upon completion of course objectives and assignments. School nurses who have an appropriate educational background are in a unique position to make significant contributions to the school-age child, family, educational staff, and community. School Nursing I is designed to give prospective school nurses the background they need to carry out their responsibilities.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

G Synoground. 1984. A program to prepare prospective school nurses.. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1561.1984.tb08938.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Assessing the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system: digital vs plaster dental casts.

INTRODUCTION: The purposes of this study were to determine whether the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system (ABO OGS) can be assessed accurately from digital dental casts and whether there are statistical differences between digital and plaster dental casts in scoring the ABO OGS. METHODS: Thirty posttreatment plaster dental casts were selected and scanned by OrthoCAD (Cadent, Carlstadt, NJ) to produce 30 corresponding digital dental casts. The plaster and digital casts were compared by using the criteria of the ABO OGS. Because the data were ordinal, a nonparametic statistical analysis was used. RESULTS: The Wilcoxon test for paired samples showed significant differences between the plaster and digital casts for occlusal contacts, occlusal relationships, and total scores (P <.05). No significant differences were found for alignment, marginal ridges, overjet, and interproximal contacts. Buccolingual inclination was not included in this study because of inability to perform proper measurements with the OrthoCAD program. Mean differences of points deducted ranged from .03 point for marginal ridges to 5.07 points for the total score. The variable with the most points deducted related to occlusal relationships, and the fewest points were deducted for interproximal contacts. CONCLUSIONS: Based on this study, the current OrthoCAD program (version 2.2) was not adequate for scoring all parameters as required by the ABO OGS.

Certification↗