Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 6549331

Leprosy detection through non-survey techniques.

R Ganapati·C R Revankar·K R Bandkar·V V Dongre
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Most practical and cheap techniques other than mass surveys to detect leprosy in urban slums are still not known. The population inhabiting a large somewhat isolated slum in North Bombay was exposed to intensive health education programmes over a period of two years. Leprosy cases reporting as a result of these measures as well as those detected by trained workers casually or through contact examination were registered at two weekly clinics conducted within the slum. A total of 184 patients out of whom 27 were smear +ve, were identifiable by these means. The population of the slum was found to be 18228. Total prevalence rate of leprosy after examining 14723 subjects in the colony was revealed to be 24 per 1000 (smear +ve cases: 2.2. per 1000) out of which a prevalence of 12.4 per 1000 (smear +ve cases: 1.8 per 1000) had actually come to our knowledge even before instituting mass surveys. The results of this study indicate that in comparable urban situation it should be possible to identify 54% of total leprosy cases by techniques other than surveys. More significantly a striking feature of this study is that 82% of cases of true public health significance namely smear +ve patients could be unearthed by these means.

Explore related subjects

Health EducationHumansIndiaLeprosyMass ScreeningMethodsPoverty AreasComparative StudyJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R Ganapati, C R Revankar, K R Bandkar, V V Dongre. Leprosy detection through non-survey techniques.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6549331/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Lifestyle interventions in cancer survivors: designing programs that meet the needs of this vulnerable and growing population.

In the world today, there are roughly 25 million cancer survivors. Although the increasing numbers of survivors testifies to the success of early detection and treatment, there is a downside. Cancer survivors are at increased risk for second cancers, other forms of comorbidity (e.g., cardiovascular disease, diabetes, osteoporosis), and functional decline. Lifestyle factors, such as a healthy diet, regular exercise, and smoking cessation may prevent these conditions and improve survivors' quality of life. Data also are accumulating to suggest that healthful lifestyle practices and successful weight management may prevent progressive or recurrent disease. Previous surveys conducted among both adult and pediatric cancer survivors indicate that most survivors have high levels of interest in diet and exercise interventions. Additionally, survivors who smoke report high levels of interest in interventions aimed at smoking cessation. Many factors, such as intervention timing and duration and channels of delivery, must be carefully considered in developing interventions that best meet the needs of this vulnerable population. Total transparency also is necessary in reporting the results of trials to ensure the inclusion of information regarding proportional accrual, attrition, and study sample sociodemographic characteristics to move toward the development of interventions most likely to gain broad-scale acceptance and adherence. Home-based interventions that rely on telephone counseling, mailed materials, or computer-assisted approaches offer promising means of reaching the geographically dispersed population of cancer survivors. More research is necessary to develop interventions that can reach and effectively promote long-term behavior change in this ever-increasing population.

Health Education↗