Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 6542184

Recommendations for appropriate statistical practice in toxicologic experiments.

Abstract

Appropriate statistical practice in toxicologic research is reviewed. The problem centers on the antagonistic needs to discover toxic effects and avoid false indictments of harmless compounds. Specific problems which distort error rates include having many dependent variables, conducting many tests on a variable, data snooping, lack of statistical power and 5) violations of statistical assumptions. Solution strategies include top down planning, designing efficient experiments, balancing type I and type II error rates, selecting hypotheses and 5) using appropriate statistical analysis methods. Top down planning and the "leapfrog" design strategy are particularly emphasized.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

K E Muller, C N Barton, V A Benignus. 1984. Recommendations for appropriate statistical practice in toxicologic experiments.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6542184/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

An overview of the integrative research review.

The integrative literature review has many benefits to the scholarly reviewer, including evaluating the strength of the scientific evidence, identifying gaps in current research, identifying the need for future research, bridging between related areas of work, identifying central issues in an area, generating a research question, identifying a theoretical or conceptual framework, and exploring which research methods have been used successfully. The 5-stage integrative review process includes (1) problem formulation, (2) data collection or literature search, (3) evaluation of data, (4) data analysis, and (5) interpretation and presentation of results. Maintaining scientific integrity while conducting an integrative research review involves careful consideration to threats to validity. Strategies to overcome these threats are reviewed. The integrative review methodology must involve detailed and thoughtful work, the outcome of which can be a significant contribution to a particular body of knowledge and, consequently, to practice and research.

Research Design↗