Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 6541087

Multidisciplinary team functioning.

Abstract

This paper advocates the need to move beyond interdisciplinary team composition as a minimum criterion for multidisciplinary functioning in child abuse treatment. Recent developments within the field reflect the practice of shared professional responsibility for detection, case management and treatment. Adherence to this particular model for intervention requires cooperative service planning and implementation as task related functions. Implicitly, this model also carries the potential to incorporate the supportive functioning essential to effective group process. However, explicit attention to the dynamics and process of small groups has been neglected in prescriptive accounts of multidisciplinary child abuse team organization. The present paper therefore focuses upon the maintenance and enhancement aspects of multidisciplinary group functioning. First, the development and philosophy of service for the Alberta Children's Hospital Child Abuse Program are reviewed. Second, composition of the team, it's mandate for service, and the population it serves are briefly described. Third, the conceptual framework within which the program functions is outlined. Strategies for effective group functioning are presented and the difficulties encountered with this model are highlighted. Finally, recommendations are offered for planning and implementing a multidisciplinary child abuse team and for maintaining its effective group functioning.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

K E Kovitz, P Dougan, R Riese, J R Brummitt. 1984. Multidisciplinary team functioning.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0145-2134(84)90076-0

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Infectious diseases and injuries in child day care. Opportunities for healthier children.

OBJECTIVE: To provide pertinent background information on infectious diseases and injury in child day care and outline measures to address these health care needs. DESIGN: We reviewed published English-language literature identified through a MEDLINE bibliographic search, major literature summaries, and bibliographies from identified articles. SETTING: Child day-care settings reviewed included family child care homes, centers, special facilities for ill children, and facilities for children with special needs. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: Primarily children in a variety of day-care settings, often compared with children cared for at home. MAIN OUTCOMES: The occurrence of outbreaks and illness related to infectious disease and injury. RESULTS: Compared with preschool-aged children reared at home, among children in day care the risk of some infectious diseases was two to four times greater. Rates of both intentional and unintentional injuries in day-care settings were somewhat lower than those for children cared for at home. CONCLUSIONS: Because preschool-aged children spend increasing time in structured day-care settings, the risk for some infectious diseases has increased. At the same time, child day-care settings present opportunities for ensuring healthier children through enhanced development, safer environments, better nutrition, increased vaccination coverage, and health promotion.

Child Abuse