PubMed · 6540842
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
A Pybus, T Torda, H J McQuay, R A Moore. Opiates and sexual function.. https://doi.org/10.1038/310636b0
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
PURPOSE: To highlight technical aspects and pitfalls of spinal anesthesia (SA) in infants. METHODS: The medical history and perioperative course of all infants who underwent SA over a 28-month period were collected (retrospectively in the first 20). RESULTS: Sixty-two infants underwent surgery under SA. Fifty-five were premature and former-premature, postconceptional age 43.3 +/- 5.0 weeks, weight 3261 +/- 1243 g. Of these, 21 had co-existing disease: cerebral (six), cardiac (nine), pulmonary (11) and urological (six). Hyperbaric tetracaine or bupivacaine 1 mg x kg(-1) with adrenaline was administered. Four infants (three premature) required N(2)O supplementation and three needed general anesthesia. The supplementation rate was similar or lower than in previous studies. Postoperatively, all seven were shown to have lower limb motor and sensory blockade. Complications in premature patients included intraoperative hypoxemia (two), apnea (two) and bradycardia (one). Postoperative complications included bradycardia (three), hypoxemia (one) and apnea and hypoxemia (one). The postoperative complication rate was similar to previous studies. CONCLUSION: Successful SA in infants depends on close attention to preoperative assessment, appropriate patient positioning during and after lumbar puncture, drug dosing and intra- and postoperative cardiorespiratory monitoring. A relatively high dose of hyperbaric solution of tetracaine or bupivacaine with adrenaline should be administered.
Back pain after spinal anaesthesia is often attributed to the spinal anaesthesia and the accompanying puncture. We demonstrate two cases where this problem was not caused by spinal anaesthesia but was due to sacroiliac joint blockage caused by bedding. As far as we know, this complication has not been described yet. When taken into account, it can be treated easily and with success.
IMPLICATIONS: Features suggestive of subdural block appeared after an apparently normal subarachnoid block. The long bevel of the reusable Quincke-type spinal needle may have contributed to the development of this complication. We propose that spinal needles should have a smaller bevel to minimize the possibility of such a complication.