Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 6503786

1980 Melbourne marathon study.

Abstract

Most of the 5423 entrants in the Melbourne 1980 Big M Marathon were non-elite athletes. A study of a stratified random sample of 459 entrants (which represented a 42% response rate) found that, while entrants reflected the community standards of disease, they pursued healthier lifestyles. Preparation for the marathon led to a number of positive changes in the health standard of runners. The principal negative consequence of marathon training was the high rate of musculoskeletal problems (30%). Before the race, only 4% of participants had an adequate fluid intake; 33% had pre-existing problems, mainly involving muscles and joints (63%) and viral or gastrointestinal illnesses (41%). These entrants had a 60% less chance of finishing the race. Symptoms during the race were reported by 92% of entrants, but most of these were not serious; only 6% of entrants were unable to finish the race. The pattern of symptoms after the race was similar to that during the race; 50% of these resolved within three hours. Ninety-seven entrants (2%) required medical attention during the race. Serious problems were rare (only in three entrants), and no runner required admission to hospital for longer than 24 hours. Entrants were at greater risk of requiring medical attention or experiencing problems during and after the race if they had a shorter preparation (less than two months), ran fewer kilometres per week (less than 60 km/week) in the last two or three months before the race, and had performed fewer long training runs (more than 24 km).

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A Kretsch, R Grogan, P Duras, F Allen, J Sumner, I Gillam. 1980 Melbourne marathon study.. https://doi.org/10.5694/j.1326-5377.1984.tb132956.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Injuries in Swedish skydiving.

OBJECTIVE: To create a basis for prevention of modern skydiving injuries. DESIGN: Descriptive epidemiological study. SETTING: National total material. PATIENTS: Data on all reported injury events (n = 257) in Swedish skydiving 1999-2003 (total 539,885 jumps) were retrieved from the Swedish Parachute Association. Non-fatally injured skydivers were sent a questionnaire asking for event and injury details (response rate 89%), and supplementary hospital records were retrieved for the most serious injuries (n = 85). Human, equipment and environmental factors were assessed for risk. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Frequency and severity of injuries. RESULTS: Incidence of non-fatal injury events was 48 per 100,000 jumps. The lower extremities, spine and shoulders were important regions of injury. The most serious injuries were experienced by licensed skydivers, but students in training had a higher injury rate and more often left the sport because of the injury. Of two student-training systems, one had an incidence less than half that of the other. CONCLUSIONS: A basis for prevention was created, showing a potential for reduction of frequency and severity of injuries with training and technical interventions.

Athletic Injuries↗

Screening for catastrophic neck injuries in sports.

The cervical spine is prone to injury due to the structure of the articulating vertebrae at the level of C4-C6, where the spinal cord occupies more of the spinal canal. Cervical spine injuries can occur in all sports and all ages. Participation in contact sports certainly increases the possibility of cervical spine injuries. In screening for catastrophic neck injuries it is vital to examine incidence and injury surveillance statistics in sports. These data can help determine sport-specific preponderance of catastrophic injury. Screening methods for predisposition to catastrophic cervical spine injuries include a concise history, physical examination, and radiographic methods. There is currently no universal classification system utilizing imaging of the cervical spine that has been validated as a screening method for catastrophic neck injuries.

Athletic Injuries↗