Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 6472588

Constant ventricular drainage: pitfalls and variables. Technical note.

Abstract

After observing the erratic performance of a commercially available ventricular drainage system, we examined the hydrostatic pressure exerted by the system as a function of the volume of fluid within the drainage bag (at a constant height). Initially, 3 to 4 cm more than the expected 27 cm of height was required to achieve a drainage pressure of 20 mm Hg. As the volume of fluid increased, there was an initial precipitous fall from the 20 mm Hg preset pressure to 14 to 16 mm Hg; this pressure differential increased as the volume of drained fluid increased. Removal of air from the drainage bag resulted in an additional decrement in the observed hydrostatic pressure. These decrements in pressure were not apparent with another commercially available bag used commonly for ventricular drainage. We therefore recommend that, if ventricular drainage is to be accomplished against a constant hydrostatic pressure head, the system should be configured so that the actual hydrostatic pressure against which drainage occurs can be measured quickly and easily. The system should be checked at frequent intervals as the ventricular drainage bag fills. We note additional pitfalls in use of constant ventricular drainage and suggest solutions.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M J Rosner, D Hayes, M Clark. 1984. Constant ventricular drainage: pitfalls and variables. Technical note.. https://doi.org/10.1227/00006123-198407000-00024

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Comparison of intracranial pressure measured simultaneously within the brain parenchyma and cerebral ventricles.

We report a 48-year-old man treated for acute subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) wherein intracranial pressure (ICP) was measured simultaneously within the ventricular cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and the brain parenchyma (PAR). Single pressure waves within the continuous pressure signal were identified with determination of the single wave parameters pulse amplitude (i.e. pressure difference between diastolic minimum pressure and systolic maximum pressure), mean pressure (i.e. mean pressure from beginning to ending minimum diastolic minimum pressure), and latency (i.e. rise time from diastolic minimum pressure to systolic maximum pressure). A total of 218,589 CSF/PAR single pressure wave pairs were analyzed. For these CSF/PAR wave pairs the mean difference in pulse pressure amplitude was -0.13 mmHg [95% confidence interval (CI) -0.13 to -0.12 mmHg], mean difference in mean single wave pressure -0.71 mmHg (95% CI -0.74 to -0.68 mmHg), and mean difference in latency -0.01 seconds (95% CI -0.01 to -0.01 seconds). Hence, in this patient monitoring ICP within the ventricular CSF or brain parenchyma gave similar results. Moreover, the comparisons of single CSF/PAR wave pulse pressure amplitudes gave no evidence of a pressure gradient from brain parenchyma to the ventricular CSF in this patient.

Cerebral Ventricles↗

Periventricular nodular heterotopia and Williams syndrome.

We report here on the first case of a child with bilateral periventricular nodular heterotopia (PNH) and Williams syndrome. Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) analyses demonstrated a deletion of the elastin gene in the Williams syndrome critical region (WSCR). Further mapping by loss of heterozygosity analysis both by microsatellite marker and SNP profiling demonstrated a 1.5 Mb deletion beyond the telomeric end of the typical WSCR. No mutations were identified in the X-linked filamin-A gene (the most common cause of PNH). These findings suggest another dominant PNH disorder along chromosome 7q11.23.

Cerebral Ventricles↗