Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 6352750

Mastitis--progress on control.

Abstract

Mastitis has been investigated for over 100 yr, but progress in control has been slow. The reasons for this are complex. Mastitis is caused by several types of infection, each with a different etiology. The possible methods for control are eradication, immunization, therapy, breeding resistant cows, or by improved management factors, but in practice success has been achieved only with the latter. The first practical control was based on specific hygiene methods coupled with the improved use of antibiotic therapy. Later this was augmented by better designs of milking equipment and improved housing. By the control method it is possible to eradicate or reduce to few cows infections caused by staphylococci, Streptococcus agalactiae, and Streptococcus dysgalactiae, but control of Streptococcus uberis is much less effective and coliform mastitis is unaffected. Research indicates that these varying degrees of success are due to basic differences in the various types of infection. There is poor control with infection caused by pathogens that emanate from sources other than the mammary gland and multiply mainly in bedding material (environmental pathogens). Further progress probably depends on the degree of exposure of udders, particularly to these pathogens.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

F H Dodd. 1983. Mastitis--progress on control.. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(83)82005-0

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Detection of two porcine circovirus type 2 genotypic groups in United States swine herds.

In late 2005, sporadic cases of an acute onset disease of high mortality were observed in 10- to 16-week-old growing pigs among several swine herds of the United States. Tissues from the affected pigs in Kansas, Iowa, and North Carolina were examined, and porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2) was detected consistently among these tissues. Phylogenetically, PCV2 can be divided into two major genotypic groups, PCV2-group 1 and PCV2-group 2. Whereas PCV2-group 1 isolates were detected in all the diseased animals, only two of the diseased animals harbored PCV2-group 2 isolates. This observation is important because PCV2-group 1 isolates had never been reported in the United States before (GenBank as of May 16, 2006), and they are closely related to the PCV2-group 1 isolates that have been described in Europe and Asia, previously. Our analysis revealed that each genotypic group contains a distinct stretch of nucleotide or amino acid sequence that may serve as a signature motif for PCV2-group 1 or PCV2-group 2 isolates.

Animal Husbandry↗

Performance of gestating sows in bedded hoop barns and confinement stalls.

The effects of gestation housing systems on sow and litter performance were evaluated for 2.5 yr in southwest Iowa. Gestation housing system treatments were as follows: 1) individual gestation stalls in a mechanically ventilated confinement building with a partially slatted floor and a manure flush system and 2) group pens with individual feed stalls in deep-bedded, naturally ventilated hoop barns. In all, 957 litters from 353 sows were evaluated. Number of pigs born alive per litter differed for the 2 housing treatments (P = 0.002). Sows gestated in hoop barns gave birth to more live pigs per litter (10.0 +/- 0.2 pigs) than sows gestated in stalls (9.3 +/- 0.2 pigs). Preweaning mortality was not different for the 2 housing treatments (P = 0.70). Cross-fostering was done to equalize litter size within 24 h of birth, which resulted in an equal number of weaned pigs per sow (P = 0.50) regardless of gestation housing treatment. The weaning-to-breeding interval was different (P = 0.01), with sows kept in stalls (4.3 +/- 0.6 d) returning to estrus sooner than sows gestated in hoop barns (6.0 +/- 0.6 d). These results indicate that gestating sows can be housed as groups in deep-bedded hoop barns equipped with individual feeding stalls and will perform comparably to gestating sows housed in confinement systems with individual gestation stalls.

Animal Husbandry↗