Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 6317821

Evaluating clinical performance using simulated patients.

Abstract

In summary, we believe that nurse practitioners use the nursing process in giving primary health care to patients, and their skill in using that process must be periodically evaluated as they move through their educational program. Further, we believe that consumers have the right to expect a beginning level of competence from graduates of nursing programs. Based on our experience, we believe that the use of the simulated patient, now used primarily in teaching, should be expanded to be of valuable assistance in clinical performance evaluation.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

B J McDowell, D L Nardini, S A Negley, J E White. 1984. Evaluating clinical performance using simulated patients.. https://doi.org/10.3928/0148-4834-19840101-11

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Medical heuristics: the silent adjudicators of clinical practice.

Robust scientific conclusions are too sparse to inform fully most of the choices that physicians must make about tests and treatments. Instead, ad hoc rules of thumb, or "heuristics," must guide them, and many of these are problematic. Physicians extrapolate from the small samples studied by clinical trials to general populations, but they do so inconsistently. Many physicians live by rules that dictate "not treating the numbers," correcting abnormalities slowly, achieving diagnostic certainty, and operating now to avoid "greater" risk in the future. Yet in each case, historical trends or statistical realities suggest either doing the opposite or investing in more discriminating heuristics. The heuristics of medicine should be discussed, criticized, refined, and then taught. More uniform use of explicit and better heuristics could lead to less practice variation and more efficient medical care.

Clinical Competence