PubMed · 6258893
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
H R Ewers. 1981-02-06. [Amebiasis].. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2008-1070282
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
We used the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to determine the prevalence of Entamoeba histolytica and E. dispar in the wild population of macaque monkeys (Macaca fuscata) in Mt. Takasaki, Oita Prefecture, Japan. Of the 101 samples collected, 41 (42.57%) were found to be positive for E. dispar. However, no E. histolytica was detected from the collected samples. The results of this survey demonstrate the high prevalence of E. dispar in macaque monkeys in the study area. Moreover, they provide additional baseline information on naturally acquired infectious agents of macaque monkeys and offer an accurate tool for detection of E. histolytica and E. dispar, which are needed for biomedical research using nonhuman primate models.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
A scale-bearing amoeba isolated from gills and other organs of perch Perca fluviatilis Linnaeus, 1758 was identified as Cochliopodium minus Page, 1976. This assignment was suggested by light microscopy and confirmed by ultrastructural study of both the strain isolated from perch and the environmental strain of C. minus (CCAP 1537/1A) serving as a control. This has been the first electron-microscopic definition of C. minus and, in addition, the first identification of an amoeba with a theca-like cover found to infect fish. The ability of the fish strain of C. minus to colonize gills and also internal body organs was proved experimentally.