Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 6198753

Bullectomy.

Abstract

The aims of this study were to investigate whether a relevant functional improvement before and after bullectomy was achieved in cases of a localized bulla and generalized bullous changes early and late postoperatively and to establish clear criteria for bullectomy. For this purpose, 21 patients with a localized bulla compressing the rest of the lung, and 19 with generalized bullae with emphysematous changes of the remaining lung were examined before and after (1 1/2 months and 1 1/2 years) surgery. Comparison of the preoperative and postoperative data and the follow-up included X-ray studies with planimetric assessment of the size of the bullae, lung function tests, perfusion scintigrams and clinical findings. The preoperative and postoperative statistical values of lung volume and respiratory mechanics showed the most significant differences. Bullectomy for a localized bulla with compression of the rest of the lung led to an improvement in gas exchange and respiratory mechanics. This operation, however, produced no functional improvement in cases of generalized bullous changes. Functional and clinical success is greater, the larger and more delimited the bulla is to be seen on X-ray, the more the healthy lung tissue is compressed, and, finally, the less associated diseases such as chronic bronchitis are present. Indication for bullectomy should be limited to these cases. The size of the bulla should amount to at least 2/3 of the hemithorax, preoperative function should be clearly reduced and the patient should be suffering from dyspnea.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

W Petro, C Hübner, D Greschuchna, W Maassen, N Konietzko. 1983. Bullectomy.. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-1022015

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Factors influencing neurological care].

OBJECTIVE: To analyse certain factors which contribute to the existing backlog in specialised neurological care, such as: where the patient was referred from, the reason for the appointment, tests carried out and the final diagnosis. We used a random sample of patients. DESIGN: Retrospective study of patients referred from Primary Care, who were attended as out-patients in the Neurology clinic during 1991. SITE. Health Area 2 of the Autonomous Community of Madrid. MAIN MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: The average number of patients per doctor sent from each one of the seven Centres studied was 7.69, with outliers of between 2 and 21, with a standard deviation of 3.95 and a rate of 51.31%. The proportion of new patients to patients having follow-up checks was 2 to 3, respectively. The differences between the number of patients sent from the different centres were found in the less serious pathologies. CONCLUSIONS: We suggest that the criteria used by Primary Care professionals and specialists should be strengthened and unified. This was one of the factors which weighed most on the quality and backlog of care.

Follow-Up Studies