Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 6168501

The dextrans--clinical data.

Abstract

The use of dextrans in clinical practice are mainly based on the following effects: 1. Plasma volume effects 2. Flow Promotion 3. Antithrombotic effects. The dextrans are the only plasma volume substitute with the antithrombotic effect but this discussion will only deal with their effects on plasma volume and flow. The effect on plasma volume--the colloid supported intravascular volume--can be calculated as ml of water held in circulation per gram circulating colloid--for dextran 70 around 20 ml/g, for albumin 18 ml/g and for plasma protein 12-13 ml/g. After infusion of a plasma volume substitute the volume effect depends on dose injected, molecular weight distribution, rate of disappearance from the intravascular department mainly via the kidneys. The clinical experience of a reliable plasma volume expansion can be demonstrated in animal experiments comparing different infusion fluids. The effect on erythrocyte aggregation depends on kind of substance and molecular weight distribution. The flow promoting effect is mainly due to restoration of plasma volume but also related to hemodilution and aggregation. The vasoconstriction seen in shock can be counteracted essentially with colloid supported plasma volume expansion. The supposed influence of the dextrans on the kidney function in some clinical cases has been investigated experimentally.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

L Thorén. 1980. The dextrans--clinical data.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6168501/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Recirculation, urea disequilibrium, and dialysis efficiency: peripheral arteriovenous versus central venovenous vascular access.

When accurate, non-urea-based methods of measuring recirculation are used, recirculation is usually absent in arteriovenous (AV) accesses. When urea-based methods are used to measure recirculation in AV accesses, falsely elevated recirculation rates are common. These errors are due to AV and venovenous disequilibrium (peripheral vein method), delayed systemic sampling (two-needle methods), and errors in urea measurement (all methods). The literature suggests that recirculation in central venovenous (CV) catheters is approximately 5%. The methods used for these determinations have all been urea based. However, there are few theoretical problems in using urea-based measurements for measuring recirculation in this setting, making it more likely that these values are accurate. When hemodialysis via CV and AV accesses are compared, equilibrated Kt/V values differ significantly for the same single-pool Kt/V when 15-second postdialysis blood urea nitrogen values are used for modeling, but differ minimally when 2-minute postdialysis samples are used. The impact of transient retrograde blood flow in the superior vena cava on recirculation and whether dialysis efficiency is influenced by the exact site of CV catheter placement (superior vena cava v right atrium) is uncertain.

Blood Circulation