Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 6153279

A new hypothesis for synaptic modification: an interactive process between postsynaptic competition and presynaptic regulation.

Abstract

Based on recent physiological observations, a new hypothesis for the algorithm for synaptic modification is proposed: an interactive process between postsynaptic competition and presynaptic regulation controls the synaptic modification, and both functions obey the same competitive rule. A fundamental algorithm for the competitive rule is proposed and analysed. The interactive process is deomposed into two procedures. The first one is a postsynaptic competition, in which all synapses making contact with the same postsynaptic cell compete for their terminal sites, and the postsynaptic cell makes demands for synaptic modification upon the presynaptic cells. The second one is a presynaptic regulation, in which the presynaptic cell regulates the postsynaptic demands and determines the net amount of the modification for each snyapse originating from it. The performance of the alforithm has been simulated on a digital computer. The initial structure of the simulated neural network consists of randomly-connected presynaptic and postsynaptic cells, with no other structures assumed. After repetitive presentations of a uniform stimulus, the basic configurations of neural connections (one-to-one, one-to-many, many-to-one and many-to-many connections) are organized in dependence on the parameters of the algorithm.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Y Hirai. 1980. A new hypothesis for synaptic modification: an interactive process between postsynaptic competition and presynaptic regulation.. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00337021

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Axonal transport of neurofilaments in normal and disease states.

Neurofilaments are among the most abundant organelles in neurones. They are synthesised in cell bodies and then transported into and through axons by a process termed 'slow axonal transport' at a rate that is distinct from that driven by conventional fast motors. Several recent studies have now demonstrated that this slow rate of transport is actually the consequence of conventional fast rates of movement that are interrupted by extended pausing. At any one time, most neurofilaments are thus stationary. Accumulations of neurofilaments are a pathological feature of several human neurodegenerative diseases suggesting that neurofilament transport is disrupted in disease states. Here, we review recent advances in our understanding of neurofilament transport in both normal and disease states. Increasing evidence suggests that phosphorylation of neurofilaments is a mechanism for regulating their transport properties, possibly by promoting their detachment from the motor(s). In some neurodegenerative diseases, signal transduction mechanisms involving neurofilament kinases and phosphatases may be perturbed leading to disruption of transport.

Axonal Transport↗

Jaime Alvarez and the case against slow axoplasmic transport: some epistemological reflections.

The 'slow axoplasmic transport theory' has been the prevailing view over the last forty years in order to explain the metabolic maintenance of neuronal axons and nerve endings. A significant amount of evidence against this theoretic interpretation of the existing experimental data has been presented by J. Alvarez, A. Giuditta and E. Koenig in an exhaustive review. They propose an alternative theoretical interpretation called the 'local synthesis model', integrating recent evidence for axon biology and regeneration. We present some epistemological considerations that reinforce the above criticisms and propositions.

Axonal Transport↗