PubMed · 6113390
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
C B Goodhart. 1981-06-27. Abortion weights.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(81)92614-3
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
One hundred and seven pregnant cows, which had been calfhood vaccinated with Brucella abortus strain 19 (S-19) were revaccinated with either S-19 or strain RB51 (S-RB51). All S-19-revaccinated animals seroconverted, while none of the RB51-revaccinated animals seroconverted. Two out of 25 (8%) S-19-revaccinated animals aborted, while none of the 57 RB51-revaccinated group aborted. Four of the S-19-revaccinated animals shed S-19 in the milk for at least 7 days, while only 1 cow shed S-RB51 for at least 3 days (but <7 days) post-parturition. Revaccination of strain 19 calfhood-vaccinated, pregnant cattle with S-RB51 appears to be a safe procedure with no diagnostically negative consequences.
The objectives of the present study were to assess the reproductive performance and cumulative incidence risk of reproductive disorders and to compare the success of artificial insemination (AI) to natural service (by handmating; NS) in dairy cattle kept in smallholder herds under a zero-grazing system in a rural highland area of Tanzania. Data on occurrence of all normal and abnormal reproductive events were collected for 215 adult animals belonging to 74 households. The median and range of the intervals: intercalving, calving to first service, and calving to pregnancy were 477 (335-860), 154 (38-486) and 206 (61-567) days, respectively. Breed and parity did not affect the reproductive parameters (P>0.05). However, cows in the milked group had a shorter median calving interval than those in the suckled group (P<0.001). The overall percentage pregnant and the percentage pregnant to first service were higher in the NS than in the AI group (49 vs. 32%; P=0.007) and (67 vs. 25%; P<0.001), respectively. The median numbers of services per pregnancy were not different between the AI (3) and NS (2) groups (P=0.17). The cumulative incidence risk of abortion, dystocia, prolapse, retained fetal membranes, mastitis, milk fever and cyclic non-breeders were 16.0, 1.7, 2.5, 4.2, 5.0, 1.7, and 6.1%, respectively. Hoof overgrowth (4.6%) and hoof deviation (4.6%) were the most-frequent digital problems. We concluded that reproductive parameters and cumulative incidence risk of abortion show suboptimal reproductive performance in rural-based, zero-grazed smallholder dairy herds in Tanzania particularly those using AI.
The origin of human triploidy is controversial. Early cytogenetic studies found the majority of cases to be paternal in origin; however, recent molecular analyses have challenged these findings, suggesting that digynic triploidy is the most common source of triploidy. To resolve this dispute, we examined 91 cases of human triploid spontaneous abortions to (1) determine the mechanism of origin of the additional haploid set, and (2) assess the effect of origin on the phenotype of the conceptus. Our results indicate that the majority of cases were diandric in origin because of dispermy, whereas the maternally-derived cases mainly originated through errors in meiosis II. Furthermore, our results indicate a complex relationship between phenotype and parental origin: paternally-derived cases predominate among "typical" spontaneous abortions, whereas maternally-derived cases are associated with either early embryonic demise or with relatively late demise involving a well-formed fetus. As the cytogenetic studies relied on analyses of the former type of material and the molecular studies on the latter sources, the discrepancies between the data sets are explained by differences in ascertainment. In studies correlating the origin of the extra haploid set with histological phenotype, we observed an association between paternal-but not maternal-triploidy and the development of partial hydatidiform moles. However, only a proportion of paternally derived cases developed a partial molar phenotype, indicating that the mere presence of two paternal genomes is not sufficient for molar development.