Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 6074623

The prothrombin time.

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J H Callicott. 1967. The prothrombin time.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6074623/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Glasgow Coma Scale predicts coagulopathy in pediatric trauma patients.

The aim of this study was to determine if neurologic findings at the time of initial resuscitation can predict coagulation abnormalities resulting from head injury. Fifty-three children with head injury were reviewed for Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), prothrombin time (PT), international normalized ratio (INR), partial thromboplastin time (PTT), use of fresh frozen plasma (FFP) and outcome. Twenty-six of the 53 children (49%) presented with a GCS of 15 and 27 (51%) had a GCS less than 14. The incidence of computed tomography (CT)-documented intracranial injury was 12% in those children with a GCS of 15 versus 78% when GCS < or = 14 (P < .05). Abnormal coagulation (PT > 14.5, INR > 1.2, PTT > 38) in children with a GCS = 15 was 7% v 67% when GCS was < or = 14 (P < .05). A mean of 1 unit of FFP per patient was required in children with a GCS of < or = 14. No child with GCS of 15 and CT evidence for intracranial injury had a coagulopathy, and no child with GCS of 15 required FFP. In head injured children, significant coagulation abnormalities requiring treatment are excluded by the presence of a normal GCS at presentation. Children with GCS less than 14 are at risk for intracranial injury and coagulopathy, this risk increases inversely with the GCS. Children who present with a GCS less than 8 should have FFP prepared at the time of admission. These data may guide the use of laboratory tests and blood bank resources during trauma resuscitation.

Blood Coagulation Tests↗

Conceptions and misconceptions in testing for lupus anticoagulants.

The aim of the following presentation is to review certain technical issues complicating clotting tests for lupus anticoagulants (LA). This is a field riddled with incorrect and misleading studies which often make progress difficult and which are difficult to retract. Inconsistent test sensitivity comparisons are sometimes due to incorrect methods being used but are more often due to contamination with platelets and instrument effects. Time dependence of LA is often due to pH drift during incubation and probably all LA are immediate acting (at least in our hands). The use of platelets in confirmatory tests is dangerous and can lead to false-positive results in patients with anti-factor V and heparin-like inhibitors.

Blood Coagulation Tests↗