PubMed · 6028607
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
P V Strumia, A J Eusebi. 1967. Automated oxyhemoglobin determination.. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp%2F48.1_ts.143
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
BACKGROUND: Analysis of urinary free catecholamines was automated recently, but analysis of plasma samples posed special difficulties. The present study was undertaken to evaluate a new method for the automated analysis of plasma catecholamines. METHODS: The procedure is based on an improved sample handling system that includes dialysis and sample clean-up on a strong cation trace-enrichment cartridge. The catecholamines norepinephrine, epinephrine, and dopamine are then separated by reversed-phase ion-pair chromatography and quantified by electrochemical detection. RESULTS: Use of a 740- microL sample is required to give the catecholamine detection limit of 0.05 nmol/L and analytical imprecision (CV) between 1.1% and 9.3%. The assay can be run unattended, although >12 h of analysis time is not recommended without cooling of the autosampler rack. Comparison (n = 68) of the automated cation-exchange clean-up with the well-established manual alumina procedure gave excellent agreement (mean, 3.78 +/- 2.76 and 3.8 +/- 2.89 nmol/L for norepinephrine and 0.99 +/- 1.72 and 1.08 +/- 1.78 nmol/L for epinephrine). Hemodialysis had no clear effect on plasma norepinephrine. Epinephrine concentrations were similar (0.05 < P < 0.1) in chronic renal failure patients (0.24 +/- 0.3 nmol/L; n = 15) and healthy controls (0.5 +/- 0.24 nmol/L; n = 31). Dopamine was not quantified, being usually <0.2 nmol/L. CONCLUSION: The availability of such a fully automated procedure should encourage the more widespread use of plasma catecholamine estimation, e.g., after dialysis, exercise, or trauma/surgery and in the investigation of catecholamine-secreting tumors, particularly in the anuric patient.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The factor V Leiden mutation, a G-->A transition at position 1691 in exon 10 of the gene that codes for factor V, produces an Arg506Gln substitution and is the most common genetic risk factor for venous thrombosis. We have developed a rapid, sensitive, and specific method to detect the factor V Leiden mutation in genomic DNA from whole blood by PCR amplification and microparticle enzyme immunoassay detection using the Abbott LCx instrument. We compared this automated method with the standard procedure using restriction endonuclease digestion of PCR products followed by gel electrophoresis in blinded experiments. In 130 patients (from Veterans Affairs medical centers) with deep venous thromboses, including 24 heterozygotes with the factor V Leiden mutation, there was complete agreement between the two methods. The assay was also able to distinguish heterozygotes from homozygotes. This method, which carries a low potential for cross-contamination of samples, should be a useful routine test for the factor V Leiden mutation in clinical laboratories with sufficient demand for molecular diagnostic assays using the LCx instrument.