Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 6016950

Human echo perception.

Abstract

It has been shown that human test subjects have the ability, under controlled laboratory conditions, to use echoes to detect the presence or absence of targets placed before them. In addition, blind and sighted persons have been able to detect a target monaurally, to make simple shape discriminations, and to locate a target in space. Signal, environmental, and individual variability affect performance in a measurable fashion. This research is an initial step in measuring the limits of a human being's ability to use echoes as a source of information about his physical surroundings. At this point it seems unlikely that the unaided human ear can rival the bat's auditory system for echo perception. It may be, however, that modern technology can partially bridge the evolutionary gap and bring more useful echoes to man's ear than those it now receives. Such an accomplishment would allow us to examine the extent to which man might benefit from this means of sensing his environment.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

C E Rice. 1967-02-10. Human echo perception.. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.155.3763.656

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

The right questions to assess materials. Selecting distance learning material.

1. Distance learning provides real educational opportunities, equal to and complementary with, traditional taught programme approaches. 2. Important questions to ask about distance learning include relevance to practice, accessibility, quality assurance, assessment and value for money. 3. Distance learning need not be lonely and isolating, and can provide education that travels with students--important in today's professional context.

Distance Perception

Spatial scale dependent in-phase and anti-phase directional biases in the perception of self-organized motion patterns.

A long row of evenly spaced dots is displaced on successive frames by half the distance between the dots. Although these stimuli are directionally ambiguous, spatially and temporally coherent unidirectional and oscillatory motion patterns are perceived as a result of the temporal persistence of competing in-phase and anti-phase directional biases, respectively. The perceiver's spatial scale is critical is determining whether dots are near enough to favor an in-phase bias or far enough apart to favor an anti-phase bias. The results are explained by a differential-gradient model of cooperative interaction, which specifies that the strength of facilitating (excitatory) interactions among motion detectors with similar directional selectivity falls off with distance at a greater rate than the strength of competing inhibiting interactions.

Distance Perception

How accurate is size and distance perception for very far terrestrial objects? Function and causality.

This study investigated absolute estimation of size and distance for natural and artificial objects at viewing distances of 1.1-15.3 km (Experiments 1 and 2) and 0.4-5.0 m (Experiment 3). The main results were that, regardless of distance range, size and distance estimates (S' and D') were related to objective size and distance (S and D), respectively, by a power function with an exponent of unity, but great individual differences in exponent were obtained for the far objects. The ratio S'/D' was reasonably represented by S'/D' = K theta n and S'/D' = tan(a theta +b), rather than S'/D' = tan theta, where theta is the visual angle. Partial correlations were obtained to examine whether (1) apparent size is determined by taking apparent distance into account or (2) both apparent size and apparent distance are determined directly by external stimuli. The combined data for the far objects and the data for the close objects showed that there were high correlations between S and S' and between D and D' and a low correlation between D' and S'. The data of Experiment 2 showed that both D' and S' were highly correlated with S, D, and theta, and there was a high positive correlation between D' and S'. It was suggested that the direct-perception model is valid under some situations, but the taking-into-account model is not supported in any set of data.

Distance Perception