Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 591633

Streptococcus milleri in the appendix.

Abstract

The appendix was investigated as a possible habitat of Streptococcus milleri. Both normal and inflamed appendices were examined and the isolation rates compared. S. milleri was present in a quarter of the normal appendices and more than half of those associated with apendicitis--a difference that was statistically highly significant. The isolation rates throughout were indepencent of age. There was a pronounced connection between the presence of S. milleri in the appendix and the purulent manifestations of appendicitis. S. milleri was isolated from other abdominal sites associated with appendicitis. The frequency of isolation was increased by culture in an enrichment broth containing nalidixic acid and sulphadimidine.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

P M Poole, G Wilson. 1977. Streptococcus milleri in the appendix.. https://doi.org/10.1136/jcp.30.10.937

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Optimizing US examination to detect the normal and abnormal appendix in children.

BACKGROUND: US detection of a normal appendix can safely rule out appendicitis. However, there is a wide range of accuracy in detection of a normal appendix. OBJECTIVE: To optimize US examination to detect the normal and the abnormal appendix according to the potential positions of the appendix. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective study included 107 children who underwent gray-scale US scanning. Noncompressive and compressive graded sonography was performed to detect normal and abnormal appendices according to their potential positions. The maximum transverse diameter of the appendices was measured. RESULTS: Of the 107 children examined, 56 had a histologic diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Sonography had a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 98% for the diagnosis of appendicitis. A normal appendix was visualized in 44 (86.2%) of the 51 patients without acute appendicitis, and of these 44, 43 were true-negative and 1 was false-positive. Normal and abnormal appendices, respectively, were positioned as follows: 54.4% and 39.3% were mid-pelvic; 27.2% and 28.6% were retrocecal; 11.4% and 17.8% were deep pelvic; and 6.8% and 14.3% were abdominal. CONCLUSION: US scanning according to the potential positions of the appendix was useful in the detection of normal appendices in children suspected of having appendicitis.

Appendicitis↗