PubMed · 5703156
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
S Murao. 1968. [Arrhythmia].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/5703156/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
The aim of this study was to extract and combine non-invasive risk parameters from the signal-averaged electrocardiogram (SAECG) and heart rate variability (HRV) based on 24-hour ambulatory electrocardiography to optimize the prognostic value for arrhythmic events after acute myocardial infarction. A prospective series of 553 men < 66 years of age enrolled in the Post-Infarction Late Potential study were analyzed. Within 2 to 4 weeks after acute myocardial infarction, all patients underwent SAECG and 24-hour ambulatory electrocardiography before hospital discharge. During 6 months of followup, 25 patients (4.5%) experienced arrhythmic events (sustained ventricular tachycardia, n = 11; ventricular fibrillation, n = 7; sudden cardiac death, n = 7). The predictive power of SAECG and HRV parameters was assessed using a Cox proportional-hazards model. In HRV analysis, the most significant differences between patients with and without arrhythmic events were observed for the beat-to-beat parameter root-meansquare of successive RR differences [RMSSD]): 25.7 +/- 16.9 ms in patients with arrhythmic events versus 34.1 +/- 18.6 ms in patients free of arrhythmic events (p = 0.004). Time domain analysis of the SAECG showed the QRS duration to be most significantly different in both patient groups: 106.4 +/- 18.7 ms (arrhythmic events) versus 95.3 +/- 18.7 ms (no arrhythmic events) (p = 0.001). Based on the Cox regression model, RMSSD and QRS duration were demonstrated to be independent significant risk factors (regression coefficient for QRS duration: cq = 0.014 +/- 0.006 ms(-1), p = 0.014; for RMSSD: cr = -0.041 +/- 0.016 ms(-1), p = 0.009). Based on the regression coefficients, an analytic risk model was developed describing the arrhythmic risk as a function of QRS duration, RMSSD, and time after infarction. We conclude that the combination of beat-to-beat changes of heart rate measured by RMSSD and QRS duration from the SAECG enhances noninvasive risk stratification after myocardial infarction.
As soon as it was established that the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) effectively prevents sudden death, it became axiomatic that whether the ICD will prolong overall survival depends entirely on the population of patients to which it is applied. This axiom of overall ICD survival immediately reveals the only vital question that remains regarding usage of the ICD; namely, How does one select those patients in whom prevention of sudden death by the ICD will also prolong life? This axiom also reveals the essential futility of randomized trials now being conducted for the purpose of discerning the true efficacy of the ICD. Claims to the scientific high ground notwithstanding, if a study asks the wrong question from the beginning, then the design of that study (including whether the study is randomized or nonrandomized), is completely irrelevant. Ideally, funds now being spent on these randomized trials should be diverted to the design and initiation of more appropriate trials, trials that will teach us to select patients for the ICD more effectively. At the very least, however, we should recognize the problems inherent in the ongoing trials, so that when their results are finally published (and are loudly touted by whichever faction feels vindicated by them), we will not be carried away into inappropriate clinical behavior.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.