PubMed · 5557875
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
H A Reid. 1971-07-17. Viper bites.. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.3.5767.182-b
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
We conducted prospective, randomized analytical and observational trials to assess reconstitution times of two lyophilized crotaline snake antivenoms, Antivenin (Crotalidae) Polyvalent [Wyeth-Ayerst] (ACP) and affinity-purified, mixed monospecific crotalid antivenom ovine Fab (CroTAb) (Fab antivenom). The analytical experiment indicated Fab antivenom and ACP reached their maximum protein concentration at 25 and 45min, respectively. In the observational experiment, Fab antivenom (median 40min) had a shorter reconstitution time than ACP (>90min, p<0.008).
BACKGROUND: Antivenom is used to neutralise snake bite toxins in people showing evidence of envenomation. It is made from animal sera, and adverse effects, including life threatening anaphylaxis, are common. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of drugs given routinely with snake antivenom to prevent adverse effects. SEARCH STRATEGY: Cochrane controlled trials register; contact with researchers in the field. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised and quasi-randomised trials testing routine adrenaline (epinephrine), antihistamines, or corticosteroids. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: The two authors applied the inclusion criteria, assessed trial quality, and extracted the data. We sought additional data from trialists where required. MAIN RESULTS: One trial in Sri Lanka (n = 105) giving adrenaline with polyspecific antivenom showed fewer adverse reactions in the adrenaline group, and this effect was preserved when stratified for severity. One trial in Brazil (n = 101) using three types of Bothrops antivenom showed no benefit of antihistamine drugs. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Routine prophylactic adrenaline for polyvalent antivenom known to have high adverse event rates seems sensible, based on this one trial. If clinicians believe local factors do not justify routine adrenaline, then they should test their belief in a randomised trial. Antihistamine appears to be of no obvious benefit in preventing acute reactions from antivenoms.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.