PubMed · 5433639
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
1970. INCAP.. https://doi.org/10.1177/000992287000900714
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
This paper describes a few Central American experiences related to the development of integrated, participatory health care systems. Theory and analytic method center on the tensions inherent in the dichotomies of professional/popular, center/periphery and biomedical/traditional. Using a framework rooted in the World Health Organization's 1978 call for 'health for all' based on community-oriented primary care, this paper concludes that the underlying conditions necessary for truly integrated local health systems have not yet developed. Except for the cases of Costa Rica during 1978-1982 and Nicaragua during 1979-1990, the political will to create and support such systems has not existed. Perhaps more importantly, the cultural milieu in which Central Americans interact with their society fosters an individualistic, commercial, and paternalistic citizen/society relationship rather than the cooperative, community-oriented and democratic spirit needed for successful development of integrated local health systems. Nevertheless, there are a number of positive examples from which we can learn, and a growing tradition of citizen participation which may lead toward appropriate, sustainable, and truly integrated local health systems.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of a pediatric trauma course taught in a developing country. STUDY DESIGN: A pediatric trauma course was designed with didactic presentations and reinforced with small group case discussions. Subjects included a general trauma overview, head trauma, airway/chest trauma, cervical spine trauma, abdominal trauma, shock, burns, and orthopedic injuries. Evaluation consisted of a pre- and post-course test and questionnaire assessing the participants' knowledge and level of comfort in managing trauma. Nine months after the course, the participants were evaluated with the same post-course test. Also a questionnaire was given to physician and nurse co-workers from the participating institutions, who themselves had not participated in the course, to assess the perceptual and attitudinal impact of the pediatric trauma course. SETTING: Guatemala City, Guatemala. PARTICIPANTS: Forty-three physicians from Central America. RESULTS: Initial and nine-month post-test scores showed uniform improvement (P value < 0.05) when compared to pretest results using the Wilcoxon signed-ranks test. Analysis of the pre- and post-course questionnaires indicated that all participants felt more comfortable (scale 1 to 5) after the course managing pediatric trauma patients. All participants "strongly agreed" the course provided information that would improve their management of the pediatric trauma victim. Nine months after the course, 100% of their medical co-workers perceived physicians who participated in the pediatric trauma course to have better resuscitative skills, and 92% perceived these physicians to have a higher level of confidence. CONCLUSION: This course, when presented to physicians in a developing country, appears to be effective in improving their knowledge base regarding pediatric trauma and increasing their comfort level in managing major pediatric trauma.