PubMed · 5430832
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Y Umegaki. 1970-03-25. [Radiotherapy].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/5430832/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
PURPOSE: To smooth the scalloped dose pattern that occurs for stepped leaves at a treatment field edge defined by a multileaf collimator. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Fields with centers shifted slightly in space were superimposed to blur the staggered dose distribution at the field edge. Film dosimetry was used to monitor changes. The dose distribution for a single field position was compared to the distribution for one and three shifts. Three depths were examined and divergent alloy blocks were included in the comparison. RESULTS: The structure that appears at an edge for a single field when leaves are staggered was nearly eliminated when the field was shifted three times to give a total of four different positions. However, shifting the field one time so that two fields were superimposed gave an intermediate result with only slight improvement in the undulating dose distribution. For the four superimposed fields, the 50% isodose pattern converged to a smoothed line running along the center of the original undulating pattern. The 80 and 20% isodoses did not converge to the center of their scalloped patterns. Instead, these isodose lines were spread leaving a larger penumbra width than a divergent alloy block. CONCLUSIONS: Shifting and adding fields is an effective method for smoothing the staggered dose distribution that results when the leaves of a multileaf collimator are stepped to form an irregular field pattern. However, the width of the penumbra for the combined fields is wider than the penumbra for a cerrobend block.
Stereotactic radiosurgery with a linear accelerator requires the accurate determination of a target volume and an accurate match of the therapeutic radiation dose distribution to the target volume. X ray and CT localizers have been described that are used to define the target volume or target point from angiographic or CT data. To verify the accuracy of these localizers, measurements were made with a target point simulator and an anthropomorphic head phantom. The accuracy of determining a known, high contrast, target point with these localizers was found to be a maximum of +/- 0.5 mm and +/- 1.0 mm for the X ray and CT localizer, respectively. A technique using portal X rays taken with a linear accelerator to verify the target point is also described.