Search PubMedSearch

PubMed · 5347517

Dermatoglyphics.

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

L S Penrose. 1969. Dermatoglyphics.. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican1269-72

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Imprinting is also a mechanism for immediate or delayed hemizygous expression of several uniparental haplotypes selected from the genome of each sex.

A peculiar and interesting aspect of monoallelic or hemizygous expression, resulting from genomic imprinting, should be a likeness or resemblance for some phenotypic traits between relatives inheriting identical active genes or domains. Although the word "likon," a neologism, is reminiscent of the above implication, it is here proposed for use in a broader sense, namely, to designate a haplotype or part of a haplotype of an imprinted domain. As learned from earlier studies of imprinting and uniparental disomies, haplotypes at loci of such domains may be expressed (E) or unexpressed (U) in somatic cells; they may also be transmitted to be expressed or not in the next generation by germ cells "acting" (A) or marked to be "resting" (R) for such loci. Thus the soma/germinal status of "likons" might for each genitor be abbreviated as EA, UA, ER, and UR. In an evolutionary sense the assumption is that the same monoallelically expressed loci and domains when carried by two or more relatives should be the source of identical transcripts contributing to a closely similar phenotype. If so, the overall phenotype would be distinct if arising from some 10 to 20 imprinted genes or domains potentially gaining expression from the germ cells of either one or the other sex in humans. The result may have evolutionary implications by narrowing the scope of random individual variation and by strengthening assortative and associative values (physical, behavioral, and instinctual) in one's own lineage and species.

Chromosome Aberrations

Folate deficiency causes uracil misincorporation into human DNA and chromosome breakage: implications for cancer and neuronal damage.

Folate deficiency causes massive incorporation of uracil into human DNA (4 million per cell) and chromosome breaks. The likely mechanism is the deficient methylation of dUMP to dTMP and subsequent incorporation of uracil into DNA by DNA polymerase. During repair of uracil in DNA, transient nicks are formed; two opposing nicks could lead to chromosome breaks. Both high DNA uracil levels and elevated micronucleus frequency (a measure of chromosome breaks) are reversed by folate administration. A significant proportion of the U.S. population has low folate levels, in the range associated with elevated uracil misincorporation and chromosome breaks. Such breaks could contribute to the increased risk of cancer and cognitive defects associated with folate deficiency in humans.

Chromosome Aberrations