PubMed · 5257076
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
A Dach. 1969. [I. The partial prosthesis].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/5257076/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
A measuring system to record three-dimensional displacement of removable partial dentures (RPDs) in six degrees of freedom has been developed. The system employed three pairs of photodiode and LED that were set up in a triangle. This system was capable of recording the in vivo RPD displacement with a recording sensitivity of 0.1 mm. In vivo displacement of upper RPDs with unilateral distal extension saddle was investigated using this measuring system to determine the effect of artificial cusp inclination of molar teeth on denture mobility. Two groups of different artificial dentition were switched to be attached to each of three experimental RPDs. The artificial teeth with cusp inclinations were calibrated to contact with opposing natural dentition during lateral grinding of the mandible, while the other artificial teeth were prepared to disclude with the mandibular teeth (flat-cusp group). Displacement range and average position of a reference point at the first molar of the RPDs during mastication were measured and analyzed as a function of the cusp inclination and the test food. As a result, the average displacement of the RPDs toward the edentulous ridge was smaller in the cusp group than that in the flat-cusp group, while the range of horizontal displacement in the buccal-palatal direction was greater in the former group than the latter. The denture wearers demonstrated typical grinding strokes at the end of the closing phase of the mandiblar movements when they chewed a peanut, which was attributed to a wide range of horizontal displacement of the dentures.
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Little is known about the outcomes of treatment with mandibular removable partial dentures provided by dentists in private dental practice. PURPOSE: This study examined 15 aspects of patient satisfaction and explored the factors found to be associated with dissatisfaction. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A questionnaire was mailed to people whose dental insurance claims included CPT Code 5214 within the last 5 years. A composite measure of treatment outcome was created by combining the responses to the 15 satisfaction items, and 10 factors were then tested statistically to determine their relationship to dissatisfaction. RESULTS: A majority of the respondents were satisfied with the prosthesis, but a substantial amount of dissatisfaction existed. Dissatisfaction was greater when there was no previous wearing experience or when there was an opposing maxillary removable partial denture. Respondents under the age of 60 expressed more dissatisfaction than did those over the age of 60, and subjects with lower levels of general health also reported less satisfaction. One third of the respondents believed their prosthesis required adjustment or replacement, and one fourth said the removable partial denture had caused a problem with the natural teeth. CONCLUSION: A majority of survey respondents treated with a mandibular removable partial denture in private dental practice were satisfied with the prosthesis, but a substantial amount of dissatisfaction existed. Dissatisfaction was related to age, health, prior experience with a prosthesis, and the type of opposing dentition.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.