PubMed · 5256722
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
S J Oltmans. Interdental floss threader.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/5256722/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect that two guides to tooth preparation had on an operator's ability to appropriately and consistently prepare teeth for porcelain laminate veneers. STUDY DESIGN: In-vitro study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty typodont central incisor teeth were randomly allocated into three groups and a general dental practitioner was asked to prepare the teeth for porcelain laminate veneers. Group A were prepared freehand while Groups B and C were prepared with the assistance of a silicone index and depth preparation bur respectively. Images of the prepared teeth were used to calculate the mean labial depth of preparation and incisal reduction of teeth in each group. RESULTS: The mean labial reduction for Groups A, B and C was 0.37 mm (SD 0.13), 0.62 mm (SD 0.17) and 0.61 mm (SD 0.15) and the mean incisal reduction for Groups A, B and C was 1.0 mm (SD 0.28), 1.0 mm (SD 0.38) and 1.03 mm (SD 0.26) respectively. CONCLUSION: It is suggested that consideration be given to the use of a silicone index or depth gauge bur when teeth are prepared for porcelain laminate veneers.
AIM: The aim of this investigation was to assess canal cleaning following shaping with hand files of greater taper. METHODOLOGY: Thirty mesial canals and 30 distal canals in mandibular molars were prepared with .08 and .10 hand files of greater taper, respectively. Following initial preparation, 0.02 instruments were used incrementally shorter in a stepback manner. In half the canals instrumentation was performed to size 35 1 mm short of the canal terminus. In the other half the series was continued through to size 60 using stepback increments of half to one millimetre as appropriate (foramen size was maintained at size 20 in all groups). Sodium hypochlorite (4.5%) and REDTA (17%) were used as irrigants for all groups. Cleaning efficacy was evaluated by scoring the amount of remaining debris using a light microscope (x50) and calibrated eyepiece micrometer (range 0-3). RESULTS: Canals stepped back through to a size 60 were significantly cleaner than those instrumented to a size 35 only (Mann-Whitney P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Refining the apical region of canal preparation by stepping back through to a size 60 reduced remaining debris following shaping with files of greater taper.
The purpose of this study was to compare nickel-titanium and stainless-steel spreader penetration in curved canals. Twenty prepared plastic blocks with a 30 degrees curvature were used for each part of the study. In part 1, the force required to insert each spreader to within 1 mm of working length in an empty canal was measured. In part 2, the force required to insert each spreader to within 3 mm of working length was measured in a canal containing a master cone. In part 3, the depth of penetration of each spreader with a master cone in place using a 1.5 kg force was measured. Additionally, in part 3, the depth of penetration of the first accessory cone was measured. The results from part 1 showed that a nickel-titanium spreader required significantly less force than a stainless-steel spreader (0.30 kg vs. 0.59 kg). In part 2, a nickel-titanium spreader required significantly less force than a stainless-steel spreader (1.56 kg vs. 2.42 kg). In part 3, a nickel-titanium spreader penetrated significantly deeper than a stainless-steel spreader (15.0 mm vs. 14.0 mm). There was no significant difference in the depth of penetration of the first accessory cone used after either spreader (0.8 mm vs. 0.7 mm). Therefore, the potential for vertical root fracture in curved canals during lateral condensation may be minimized by using nickel-titanium spreaders.