PubMed · 5107892
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
D J Fugazzotto. 1971-04-05. Chiropractic.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/5107892/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
OBJECTIVE: In this article, we investigate the use of diagnostic radiology by chiropractors in Switzerland, with the aim of determining their contribution to the annual radiation collective dose. METHODS: We approached 138 chiropractors possessing radiologic equipment and asked them to provide, among other information, the frequency of radiographic examinations. The dose associated with each type of radiographic examination was established separately. The collective dose was determined by convolution of frequency and dosimetric information. RESULTS: The number of chiropractic radiographic examinations performed in Switzerland in 1998 was 60,000, mainly spinal and pelvic examinations. The associated annual collective dose was found to be 144 Sv (an annual effective dose of 20 microSv per capita). The chiropractic contribution to the total dose due to conventional radiography in Switzerland is about 6%. CONCLUSIONS: Considering the number of chiropractors in Switzerland (less than 200), their contribution to the collective dose is relatively high. This is due to the high effective dose associated with the main types of examinations performed (eg, lumbar spine). It is therefore necessary to develop and apply guidelines for the use of this type of radiographic examination, as well as quality control programs, in order to optimize the radiographic technique and hence reduce the doses.
OBJECTIVE: To calculate the proportion of care delivered in a chiropractic practice supported by good-quality clinical trials. DESIGN: Retrospective survey. METHODS: Data were collected from patient files relating to 180 consecutive patient visits in a suburban chiropractic practice in northern Spain. Each patient's presenting complaint was paired with the chiropractor's chosen primary intervention. Based on a literature review (Medline, Mantis, and nonautomated searches of local medical libraries), each presenting complaint-primary intervention pairing was categorized according to the level of supporting evidence as follows: Category I, intervention based on good quality clinical trial evidence; Category II, intervention based on poor-quality or no clinical trial evidence. To distinguish between good- and poor-quality clinical trials, studies were critically appraised and assigned quality scores. RESULTS: Of the 180 cases surveyed, 123 (68.3%) (95% CI, 61.5%-75.1%) were based on clinical trials of good methodologic quality (Category I). Only 57 (31.7%) (95% CI, 24.9%-38.5%) of the cases were based on poor-quality or no clinical trial evidence (Category II). CONCLUSIONS: When patients were used as the denominator, the majority of cases in a chiropractic practice were cared for with interventions based on evidence from good-quality, randomized clinical trials. When compared to the many other studies of similar design that have evaluated the extent to which different medical specialties are evidence based, chiropractic practice was found to have the highest proportion of care (68.3%) supported by good-quality experimental evidence.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.