Search PubMed⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 502484

Bone conduction calibration: current status.

D D Dirks·S F Lybarger·W O Olsen·B L Billings
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Attempts to specify normal threshold sensitivity by bone conduction have been unsuccessful because of problems in obtaining reliable measurements from commercially available artificial mastoids. Recent design modifications incorporated in the Bruel and Kjaer 4930 artificial mastoids have resulted in greater uniformity among these units. However, the new design has resulted in impedances that are higher than those recommended in current standards. Bone-conduction thresholds referenced to measurements made on B & K 4930 artificial mastoids with the new design were performed on 60 normal listeners by three participating laboratories. The results are reported for consideration in the development of a reference threshold for hearing by bone conduction.

Explore related subjects

Acoustic Impedance TestsAirAudiometryAuditory ThresholdBone ConductionCalibrationHearing Loss, SensorineuralHumansModels, BiologicalReference ValuesJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D D Dirks, S F Lybarger, W O Olsen, B L Billings. 1979. Bone conduction calibration: current status.. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshd.4402.143

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2000

[Investigations and diagnosis of deafness].

Otoscopic examination and audiometric tests complement each other for the diagnosis of hearing loss. Objective tests measure the hearing loss at some specific frequencies. Endo- or retrocochlear origin of the deafness is identified thanks to these tests, leading to selection of the most appropriate therapeutic option. In children, behavioral assessment techniques are to be adapted to the patient's age. Information from tympanometry, otoacoustic emissions and possibly auditory brainstem responses, is used to complete the diagnosis. Language skills are also assessed in order to adapt the child's deafness management to his/her actual communication ability.

Acoustic Impedance Tests↗
PubMed2000

Activation of medial olivocochlear efferent system in humans: influence of stimulus bandwidth.

The activity of the medial olivocochlear bundle (MOCB) can be studied in humans through variations in the level of evoked otoacoustic emissions (EOAEs) elicited by contralateral acoustic stimuli (CAS). The present study sought to investigate how the activity of the MOC system at a given frequency, as measured through the contralateral suppression of tone-pip EOAEs, depends on the bandwidth of the contralateral stimulus. EOAEs were recorded in 155 normal-hearing subjects, successively with and without contralateral stimuli whose bandwidth, center frequency and level were systematically varied. We showed a clear dependence of contralateral EOAE suppression on bandwidth demonstrating increased suppression with increased bandwidth over about two octaves around the center frequency of the noise. This effect was obtained irrespective of whether contralateral noise energy was kept constant independently of bandwidth or not, which indicates a role of bandwidth per se in contralateral EOAE suppression. Results are interpreted in terms of a simple model of MOCB activation mechanisms including peripheral bandpass filtering, within-channel compression and across-channel spatial summation by the afferent paths. Complementary experiments suggested a greater effectiveness of increases in bandwidth on the upper than on the lower side and of frequency components akin to or remote from the test frequency than of intermediate bands. Finally, these results were complemented by detailed spectrum analyses of the EOAE level variations induced by the different noises, which revealed that whilst noise components close to or remote from the center frequency generally attenuated EOAE level, intermediate components could in some cases lead to a relative increase in EOAE level. These results can further be explained by assuming different positive and negative weights on the inputs to the spatial summation process depending on their position relative to the center frequency.

Acoustic Impedance Tests↗