PubMed · 5020488
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
R J Scholtmeijer. 1972-04-15. [Bladder tumors].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/5020488/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Amphicrine carcinomas of the stomach, defined by dual exocrine and neuroendocrine differentiation within the same neoplastic cell, are exceedingly rare. MUTYH-associated polyposis (MAP) is an autosomal recessive polyposis syndrome characterized by multiple colorectal adenomas and variable upper gastrointestinal involvement; however, amphicrine carcinomas have not been previously documented in this setting. We report a gastric amphicrine carcinoma arising in the background of extensive fundic gland polyposis in a patient with MAP. Endoscopy revealed a 3.5-cm flat elevated lesion in the gastric fundus amid extensive fundic gland polyposis. Histologically, the tumor consisted of a single population of cells exhibiting combined glandular and neuroendocrine differentiation without zonal or biphasic architecture, and many of these cells demonstrated true amphicrine morphology. Immunohistochemistry confirmed co-expression of cytokeratin and the neuroendocrine markers chromogranin A and synaptophysin in the same cell population. Germline targeted next-generation sequencing identified biallelic MUTYH variants in trans (c.733C>T, p.Arg245Cys [likely pathogenic]; c.842C>T, p.Ala281Val [variant of uncertain significance]), supporting a diagnosis of MAP. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of a gastric amphicrine carcinoma in a MAP patient, expanding the spectrum of MAP-associated upper gastrointestinal neoplasia and underscoring the importance of vigilant endoscopic surveillance in hereditary polyposis syndromes.
BACKGROUND: We sought to identify and characterize potential alterations in E2F-1, a transcription factor that binds to the retinoblastoma protein (pRB), in bladder neoplasms and to elucidate a possible role for E2F-1 as an oncogene or a tumor suppressor gene. METHODS: Tumor samples from 133 evaluable patients with bladder cancer were analyzed for E2F-1 gene mutations by use of polymerase chain reaction-single-strand conformational polymorphism (PCR-SSCP) analysis and DNA sequencing. In addition, tumors were studied for E2F-1 and pRB protein expression by use of immunohistochemistry. Results from the above analyses were correlated with clinicopathologic parameters and outcome. All P values are two-sided. RESULTS: A polymorphism, consisting of a nucleotide change at amino acid codon 393 in exon 7 (GGC-->AGC [Gly-->Ser]), was identified in seven of 133 case patients, being present in both tumor and corresponding normal tissues. No bandshifts were identified in the nuclear-localization or DNA-binding domains on PCR-SSCP analysis. On immunohistochemical analysis, E2F-1 nuclear reactivity was observed in less than 5% of the cells from 53 tumors and in 5%-75% of the cells from the remaining 80 tumors. The pattern of E2F-1 protein expression was not altered in relation to the identified polymorphism. pRB nuclear reactivity greater than 20% (of tumor cells stained) was present in 66% of the samples. E2F-1 nuclear reactivity correlated inversely with the percentage of cells showing pRB reactivity (Kendall tau(b) = -0.18; P = .019). On multivariate analysis, patients with lower E2F-1 reactivity had statistically significantly increased risks of progression to metastases (P = .001) and death (P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: E2F-1 alterations occur at the phenotypic level, rather than at the genotypic level, in bladder cancer. The adverse outcome for patients whose tumors exhibit low E2F-1 nuclear expression suggests a possible tumor suppressor role for E2F-1 in bladder cancer.
BACKGROUND: Transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) is known to inhibit primary epithelial ovarian carcinoma cells. The mechanism by which this inhibitory response is achieved is poorly understood. Furthermore, whether this response is consistent in cells from metastatic sites compared with the primary site cells is unknown. The authors wanted to determine whether TGF-beta differentially inhibited ovarian carcinoma cells from primary tumor sites compared with metastatic sites and to establish whether this response was associated with up-regulation of p21WAF1 or overexpression of p53. METHODS: Tumor cells were purified from primary and metastatic sites in five patients with advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma. TGF-beta effect at concentrations of 10, 1, and 0.1 ng/mL was determined by tritiated thymidine incorporation assay. Expression of p21WAF1 was determined by Northern and slot blot analysis. p53 was detected by immunocytochemistry. RESULTS: Metastatic tumor isolates were more responsive to the inhibitory effect of TGF-beta compared with their corresponding primary tumor isolates at 0.1 ng/mL. Increasing TGF-beta concentration conferred no additional inhibitory effect on the metastatic isolates; however, a dose-related phenomenon was observed in primary tumor isolates. p21WAF1 mRNA was up-regulated in only 2 of 10 primary and metastatic isolates. There was no correlation between TGF-beta responsiveness, p21WAF1 up-regulation, and p53 overexpression. CONCLUSIONS: Differential inhibition was observed between primary and metastatic tumor isolates. p21WAF1 up-regulation and p53 overexpression were not major modulators in TGF-beta regulation of primary and metastatic tumor growth in early passaged ovarian carcinoma cells.