PubMed · 5013342
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
R M Shiffrin, G T Gardner. 1972. Visual processing capacity and attentional control.. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0032453
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Hemispheric asymmetries in spatial processing are generally considered to be responsible for the shorter reaction time (RT) of the left hand classically observed for right-handers when pointing at targets. Surprisingly, despite the special role which the right cerebral hemisphere is known to play in visual attention, the attentional hypothesis for hand movement preparation asymmetries is currently rejected. This study aims to test the respective roles of visual attention and movement planning in the left hand RT advantage for goal-directed movements. Two experiments were conducted with the same subjects, a simple visual detection task and a classical pointing task, using the same lateralized stimuli. Subjects used the left hand and the right hand alternatively in order to react to the stimuli. In the detection task, the reaction consisted of simply releasing a switch as quickly as possible after the appearance of a target, whereas in the pointing task, it consisted of performing lateralized reaching movements towards the same target. The main results of this study revealed left hand shorter RTs for both tasks, emphasizing the role which right hemisphere dominance for visuospatial attention plays in manual aiming asymmetries. Moreover, a direct comparison of the RTs obtained in both experiments showed that the specific cost of movement planning was lower when using the left hand, therefore also revealing right hemisphere dominance for movement planning.
BACKGROUND: On the basis of the literature on autism, it was hypothesized that children with autism have deficits in attentional (dis-)engagement mechanisms. METHODS: A saccadic gap-overlap task was used to study visual engagement and disengagement in 16 high-functioning autistic children of about 10 years of age and 15 age- and IQ-matched normal control children. Subjects were asked to make saccadic eye movements from a fixation point to a suddenly appearing target as fast as possible. The saccadic reaction time was compared in two conditions: 1) the overlap condition, in which the fixation point was continuously visible, and 2) the gap condition, in which the fixation point was turned off 200 msec before the target appeared. RESULTS: Although no differences between the groups in either condition was observed, the gap effect (i.e., the difference in saccadic reaction time between the overlap condition and the gap condition) was smaller in the autistic group than in the control group. CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that autistic children show a lower level of attentional engagement.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and cognitive functioning of high-grade glioma patients in the postneurosurgical period. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The HRQOL, as assessed by the Short-Form Health Survey-36, tumor-specific symptoms, and objective and subjective neuropsychologic functioning, of 68 newly diagnosed glioma patients were compared with that of 50 patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and to age- and sex-matched healthy controls. The association between tumor lateralization, extent of resection, and use of medication, and the HRQOL outcomes was also investigated. RESULTS: The HRQOL of the two patient groups was similar but significantly lower than that of the healthy controls. Glioma patients reported significantly more neurologic symptoms and poorer objective and subjective neuropsychologic functioning than the NSCLC patients. Using healthy controls as the reference group, cognitive impairment assessed at the individual patient level was observed in all glioma patients and 52% of the NSCLC patients. Poor performance on timed tasks in the glioma group could be attributed, in large part, to visual and motor deficits. Tumor lateralization was found to affect neuropsychologic functioning in a predictable manner. The extent of resection was not related significantly to neuropsychologic functioning. Corticosteroid use was associated with better recognition memory, whereas antiepileptic drug use was correlated negatively with working memory capacity. CONCLUSION: The general HRQOL of glioma patients is similar to that of patients with NSCLC. However, they suffer from a number of condition-specific neurologic and neuropsychologic problems that have a significant impact on their daily lives in the postsurgical period, before treatment with radiotherapy.