PubMed · 4933345
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
M Fernandes. 1970. Monilial urethritis.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/4933345/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Clinical isolates of Candida auris show a high prevalence of resistance to Amphotericin B (AmB)-an uncommon trait in most Candida species. Alterations in ergosterol biosynthesis can contribute to acquired AmB resistance in C. auris laboratory strains but are rarely seen in clinical isolates. In this study, we experimentally evolved two drug-susceptible Clade II isolates of C. auris to develop AmB resistance. The evolved strains displayed a four to eight fold increase in MIC50 compared to the parental cells. We analyzed changes in their karyotype, genome, lipidome, and transcriptome associated with this acquired resistance. In one lineage, AOX2 was upregulated, and its deletion reversed the AmB resistance phenotype. The aox2Δ mutant also failed to evolve AmB resistance under experimental conditions. In the same lineage, restoring the UPC2 S332R and RTG3 S101T mutations to the wild-type allele restored AmB susceptibility. In another lineage, the ergosterol and sphingolipid pathways were observed to play a critical role, and upregulation of the ERG genes elevated the total sterol content, while significant downregulation of HSX11 (glucosylceramide synthase) resulted in lower levels of glucosylceramides. To our knowledge, this study is the first to show that AmB resistance in C. auris can be acquired through mechanisms both dependent on or independent of sterol content modulation, highlighting Aox2 and Upc2 as key regulators of amphotericin resistance.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVE: Amphotericin B failure is frequently seen in patients with candidaemia caused by Candida rugosa. We evaluated amphotericin B, fluconazole, posaconazole and voriconazole as alternative treatments against infection in mice with two isolates of C. rugosa. METHODS: Neutropenic mice were inoculated intravenously with C. rugosa. Amphotericin B, fluconazole, posaconazole and voriconazole were administered for 7 days after infection. Efficacy of the antifungal treatment was assessed by survival and tissue burden of C. rugosa. RESULTS: All of the four drugs significantly prolonged survival over controls. With both isolates, kidney counts were reduced significantly below controls for amphotericin B, fluconazole and posaconazole. However, voriconazole was less effective than the other antifungals. CONCLUSION: Despite poor clinical response to amphotericin B, in vivo data indicate that amphotericin B increases organ clearance and survival over untreated controls. However, although voriconazole improved survival over controls, increased tissue clearance was not seen. This discrepancy may be caused by rapid clearance of voriconazole in mice. These studies suggest fluconazole, posaconazole or voriconazole may be useful alternatives to amphotericin B in therapy of C. rugosa infection.