Search PubMed⌕ Search

PubMed · 4876844

[Tumors].

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

I Urushizaki. 1968. [Tumors].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/4876844/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Trypsin activity in stool and duodenal aspirate of neonates for differential diagnosis of intestinal obstruction.

The diagnosis of a non-surgical cause of delayed passage of meconium in a neonate may be challenging to the pediatric surgeon. The usefulness of determining trypsin activity (TA) in stool and duodenal aspirate for the diagnosis of cystic fibrosis (CF) and the existence of an entity called transient deficiency of trypsin (TTD) was assessed in 49 neonates over a 14-month period. TA was determined by a gelatin liquefaction technique. An absence of TA was considered if gelatin liquefaction was seen at a dilution of less than 1:100. Neonates with negative activity in both samples were started on supplementary pancreatic enzymes (pancreatin) for 1 month. TA was retested in the stool after stopping pancreatin for 1 week. Neonates with a return of TA were considered to have TTD; those who showed persistent TA deficiency at re-evaluation were investigated for CF by sweat iontophoresis. Twenty-one neonates had negative TA (in 1 only stool was tested); 13 could be re-evaluated (4 died, 4 were lost to follow-up). Nine were found to have TTD as a stool or duodenal sample showed the presence of TA; 3 of 4 patients with persistent negative TA were confirmed to have CF. One patient with normal sweat chloride is awaiting genetic studies. Determination of TA by gelatin liquefaction is a simple, rapid, inexpensive, and reliable (sensitivity 100%, negative predictive value 100%) means to differentiate non-surgical causes of intestinal obstruction such as neonatal and postoperative TTD and CF.

Clinical Enzyme Tests↗

Osborn waves associated with ventricular fibrillation in a patient with vasospastic angina.

A 52-year-old man with a history of vasospastic angina experienced a severe ischemic episode accompanied by a non-Q wave myocardial infarction. Two episodes of ventricular fibrillation (VF) occurred during the acute phase of the event. Osborn waves were observed on the ECG preceding each episode of VF. In the second episode, the gradual development of Osborn waves until VF occurred was confirmed on ECG. The Osborn waves appeared to be related to the occurrence of VF. This case may provide clinical evidence that a prominent I(to) participates in the development of VF during myocardial ischemia.

Clinical Enzyme Tests↗

Misreporting of myocardial infarction end points: results of adjudication by a central clinical events committee in the PARAGON-B trial. Second Platelet IIb/IIIa Antagonist for the Reduction of Acute Coronary Syndrome Events in a Global Organization Network Trial.

BACKGROUND: Myocardial (re)infarction (MI), a common trial end point, can be difficult to identify because of inconclusive signs and symptoms. We examined disagreement between investigator and clinical events committee (CEC) reporting of MIs in an international, randomized trial. METHODS: The primary end point of the PARAGON-B trial was a 30-day composite of death, MI (CEC adjudicated), or ischemia-driven intervention. If CEC and investigator determinations of MI differed, we sent investigators event summaries and rationales for CEC decisions and asked whether they now agreed with the CEC assessment. If they still disagreed, they were to provide a rationale and supporting data. Such cases were reviewed, and a final decision was made. RESULTS: Overall, 1736 of 5225 (33%) patients had suspected MIs; the CEC adjudicated 483 of 1736 (28%) as MIs. In 404 patients (23%), investigator and CEC assessments of MI differed; 270 MIs were identified by the CEC but not investigators, and 134 were identified by investigators but not the CEC. Most disagreements concerned periprocedural MIs, but some reflected clinical ischemia and enzyme elevations. Letters for 382 disagreements were sent and returned by investigators, and investigators came to agree with CEC assessments in 307 cases (80%). For the other 75 cases (20%), after review the investigators' assessments were confirmed in 10 cases, and the original CEC decisions were supported in the other 65 cases. CONCLUSIONS: Investigators misreport MI end points, but most later agree with CEC assessments. These data support standard, independent adjudication of suspected MIs for accurate reporting, which may affect evaluations of therapies, sample-size calculations, and event-rate comparisons across trials.

Clinical Enzyme Tests↗