PubMed · 4864938
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
B L Segal. 1967. Echocardiography.. https://doi.org/10.1159/000169172
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
AIMS: Different methods exist for measuring left ventricular function echocardiographically; each may be error prone due to the abnormal pattern of ventricular activation during pacing. METHODS AND RESULTS: Echocardiography was undertaken on 307 patients with permanent pacemakers; a subset of 57 underwent radionuclide ventriculography. Intrinsic and paced beats were analysed for left ventricular function by: Simpson's bi-plane, Teicholz M-mode, wall-motion scoring and 'eyeball' assessment. Agreement between techniques and with radionuclide ventriculography were compared according to intrinsic or paced beats. Echocardiographic measures of ejection fraction give mean values 5% higher than radionuclide ventriculography (Simpson's 30+/-9%, vs. Teicholz 30+/-13% vs. radionuclide ventriculography 25+/-9%, p=0.03). Agreement between Simpson's, Teicholz and radionuclide ventriculography by Bland-Altman analysis showed poor agreement (Simpson's vs. Teicholz range (4xSD)=57%, Simpson's vs. radionuclide ventriculography=36%, Teicholz vs. radionuclide ventriculography=46%, p=0.02), the level of agreement deteriorates with ventricular pacing (Simpson's vs. Teicholz range=61%, Simpson's vs. radionuclide ventriculography=34%, Teicholz vs. radionuclide ventriculography=47%, p=0.02). The correlation between wall motion analysis and radionuclide ventriculography is moderately poor (all subjects r=0.58, ventricular pacing r=0.52, not pacing r=0.66). CONCLUSION: Echocardiography and radionuclide ventriculography are the only non-invasive techniques to assess left ventricular function in the paced population. Results are poorly interchangeable and the accuracy of any comparison dependent on the underlying rhythm.
OBJECTIVES: We sought to examine the accuracy/consistency of a novel ultrasound speckle tracking imaging (STI) method for left ventricular torsion (LVtor) measurement in comparison with tagged magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (a time-domain method similar to STI) and Doppler tissue imaging (DTI) (a velocity-based approach). BACKGROUND: Left ventricular torsion from helically oriented myofibers is a key parameter of cardiac performance but is difficult to measure. Ultrasound STI is potentially suitable for measurement of angular motion because of its angle-independence. METHODS: We acquired basal and apical short-axis left ventricular (LV) images in 15 patients to estimate LVtor by STI and compare it with tagged MRI and DTI. Left ventricular torsion was defined as the net difference of LV rotation at the basal and apical planes. For the STI analysis, we used high-frame (104 +/- 12 frames/s) second harmonic two-dimensional images. RESULTS: Data on 13 of 15 patients were usable for STI analysis, and LVtor profile estimated by STI strongly correlated with those by tagged MRI (y = 0.95x + 0.19, r = 0.93, p < 0.0001, analyzed by repeated-measures regression models). The STI torsional velocity profile also correlated well with that by the DTI method (y = 0.79x + 2.4, r = 0.76, p < 0.0001, by repeated-measures regression models) with acceptable bias. CONCLUSIONS: The STI estimation of LVtor is concordant with those analyzed by tagged MRI (data derived from tissue displacement) and also showed good agreement with those by DTI (data derived from tissue velocity). Ultrasound STI is a promising new method to assess LV torsional deformation and may make the assessment more available in clinical and research cardiology.
Using standard treadmill exercise techniques, it has been shown that postexercise echocardiographic imaging can be performed safely and effectively while a patient is still standing on the treadmill. Furthermore, upright imaging can be initiated earlier and completed at a higher heart rate than standard supine imaging. Patients who can ambulate but with decreased agility and maneuverability and who would otherwise have been denied treadmill tests may be eligible for upright poststress imaging.