PubMed · 479016
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
C W Simcoe. 1979. Simplified extracapsular cataract extraction.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0146-2776(79)80069-5
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Cataract surgery has evolved dramatically over the last two decades, largely as a result of technological advances. As a result, visual outcomes and patient convalescence have improved significantly. A second consequence of increased instrumentation and technology, however, is increased complexity of cataract surgery and the advent of complications unique to these advances. Cataract surgeons must be aware and capable of managing the many possible adverse events that can occur during cataract surgery. This review identifies many of the common complications of cataract surgery, describes methods to avoid these complications and discusses techniques to address complications that do occur. It is the ability to avoid, quickly identify, and properly manage complications that defines the accomplished cataract surgeon.
Cystoid macular edema (CME) is a common problem after cataract extraction. It can occur after uncomplicated surgery in patients with otherwise healthy eyes, after complicated surgery, or after surgery in patients with ocular diseases such as uveitis or diabetic retinopathy. Usually vision loss from cystoid macular edema is temporary and responds to treatment with topical anti-inflammatory medications. However, some cases respond poorly to conservative treatment and may develop permanent visual loss. A review of the medical literature was performed for all articles published in English between August 1, 2001 and July 31, 2002 on the topic of cystoid macular edema after cataract surgery. The authors selected nine articles that were most relevant to the practicing ophthalmologist for inclusion in this review. Topics of interest included vitreous loss, retained lens fragments, diabetes, uveitis, retinitis pigmentosa, ocular hypotensive lipids, internal limiting membrane peeling, and intravitreal triamcinolone injection.
As the number and types of keratorefractive procedures increase and as the baby boomer population moves into the "cataractous decades," the number of patients requiring cataract surgery following refractive surgery grows larger each year. While technological advances in surgical instrumentation and intraocular lens (IOL) design allow us to perform cleaner, faster, and more reliable cataract extractions, the ultimate postoperative refraction depends primarily on calculations performed before surgery. Third-generation IOL formulas ( Haigis, Hoffer Q, Holladay 2, or SRK/T) provide outstanding accuracy when used for eyes with physiologic, prolate corneas. In addition, most instruments used today for measuring corneal curvature and power were designed before the era of refractive surgery. These formulas and instruments make assumptions about the anatomy and refractive properties of the cornea that are no longer valid following most keratorefractive procedures. These breakdowns in IOL calculation often result in a "refractive surprise" after cataract surgery, which may require subsequent surgical correction. This article examines recent publications of modeling studies of various methods for estimating effective K values for IOL calculation, cataract surgery case series following refractive surgery, new corneal topography technologies and methods for correcting "refractive surprises" postoperatively.